SLLS373M July   1999  – March 2024 SN65LVDS1 , SN65LVDS2 , SN65LVDT2

PRODUCTION DATA  

  1.   1
  2. Features
  3. Applications
  4. Description
  5. Device Options
  6. Pin Configuration and Functions
  7. Specifications
    1. 6.1 Absolute Maximum Ratings
    2. 6.2 ESD Ratings
    3. 6.3 Recommended Operating Conditions
    4. 6.4 Thermal Information
    5. 6.5 Driver Electrical Characteristics
    6. 6.6 Receiver Electrical Characteristics
    7. 6.7 Driver Switching Characteristics
    8. 6.8 Receiver Switching Characteristics
    9. 6.9 Typical Characteristics
  8. Parameter Measurement Information
  9. Detailed Description
    1. 8.1 Overview
    2. 8.2 Functional Block Diagram
    3. 8.3 Feature Description
      1. 8.3.1 SN65LVDS1 Features
        1. 8.3.1.1 Driver Output Voltage and Power-On Reset
        2. 8.3.1.2 Driver Offset
        3. 8.3.1.3 5-V Input Tolerance
        4. 8.3.1.4 NC Pins
        5. 8.3.1.5 Driver Equivalent Schematics
      2. 8.3.2 SN65LVDS2 and SN65LVDT2 Features
        1. 8.3.2.1 Receiver Open Circuit Fail-Safe
        2. 8.3.2.2 Receiver Output Voltage and Power-On Reset
        3. 8.3.2.3 Common-Mode Range vs Supply Voltage
        4. 8.3.2.4 General Purpose Comparator
        5. 8.3.2.5 Receiver Equivalent Schematics
        6. 8.3.2.6 NC Pins
    4. 8.4 Device Functional Modes
      1. 8.4.1 Operation With VCC < 1.5 V
      2. 8.4.2 Operation With 1.5 V ≤ VCC < 2.4 V
      3. 8.4.3 Operation With 2.4 V ≤ VCC < 3.6 V
      4. 8.4.4 SN65LVDS1 Truth Table
      5. 8.4.5 SN65LVDS2 and SN65LVDT2 Truth Table
  10. Application and Implementation
    1. 9.1 Application Information
    2. 9.2 Typical Applications
      1. 9.2.1 Point-to-Point Communications
        1. 9.2.1.1 Design Requirements
        2. 9.2.1.2 Detailed Design Procedure
          1. 9.2.1.2.1  Driver Supply Voltage
          2. 9.2.1.2.2  Driver Bypass Capacitance
          3. 9.2.1.2.3  Driver Input Voltage
          4. 9.2.1.2.4  Driver Output Voltage
          5. 9.2.1.2.5  Interconnecting Media
          6. 9.2.1.2.6  PCB Transmission Lines
          7. 9.2.1.2.7  Termination Resistor
          8. 9.2.1.2.8  Driver NC Pins
          9. 9.2.1.2.9  Receiver Supply Voltage
          10. 9.2.1.2.10 Receiver Bypass Capacitance
          11. 9.2.1.2.11 Receiver Input Common-Mode Range
          12. 9.2.1.2.12 Receiver Input Signal
          13. 9.2.1.2.13 Receiver Output Signal
          14. 9.2.1.2.14 Receiver NC Pins
      2. 9.2.2 Application Curve
      3. 9.2.3 Multidrop Communications
        1. 9.2.3.1 Design Requirements
        2. 9.2.3.2 Detailed Design Procedure
          1. 9.2.3.2.1 Interconnecting Media
        3. 9.2.3.3 Application Curve
  11. 10Power Supply Recommendations
  12. 11Layout
    1. 11.1 Layout Guidelines
      1. 11.1.1 Microstrip vs. Stripline Topologies
      2. 11.1.2 Dielectric Type and Board Construction
      3. 11.1.3 Recommended Stack Layout
      4. 11.1.4 Separation Between Traces
      5. 11.1.5 Crosstalk and Ground Bounce Minimization
      6. 11.1.6 Decoupling
    2. 11.2 Layout Example
  13. 12Device and Documentation Support
    1. 12.1 Device Support
      1. 12.1.1 Other LVDS Products
    2. 12.2 Third-Party Products Disclaimer
    3. 12.3 Documentation Support
      1. 12.3.1 Related Information
    4. 12.4 Receiving Notification of Documentation Updates
    5. 12.5 Support Resources
    6. 12.6 Trademarks
    7. 12.7 Electrostatic Discharge Caution
    8. 12.8 Glossary
  14. 13Revision History
  15. 14Mechanical, Packaging, and Orderable Information

Package Options

Refer to the PDF data sheet for device specific package drawings

Mechanical Data (Package|Pins)
  • D|8
  • DBV|5
Thermal pad, mechanical data (Package|Pins)
Orderable Information
Interconnecting Media

The interconnect in a multidrop system differs considerably from a point-to-point system. While point-to-point interconnects are straightforward, and well understood, the bus type architecture encountered with multidrop systems requires more careful attention. We will use Figure 9-5 above to explore these details.

The most basic multidrop system would include a single driver, located at a bus origin, with multiple receiver nodes branching off the main line, and a final receiver at the end of the transmission line, co-located with a bus termination resistor. While this would be the most basic multidrop system, it has several considerations not yet explored.

The location of the transmitter at one bus end allows the design concerns to be simplified, but this comes at the cost of flexibility. With a transmitter located at the origin, a single bus termination at the far-end is required. The far-end termination absorbs the incident traveling wave. The flexibility lost with this arrangement is thus: if the single transmitter needed to be relocated on the bus, at any location other than the origin, we would be faced with a bus with one open-circuited end, and one properly terminated end. Locating the transmitter say in the middle of the bus may be desired to reduce (by ½) the maximum flight time from the transmitter to receiver.

Another new feature in Figure 9-5 is clear in that every node branching off the main line results in stubs. The stubs should be minimized in any case, but have the unintended effect of locally changing the loaded impedance of the bus.

To a good approximation, the characteristic transmission line impedance seen into any cut point in the unloaded multipoint or multidrop bus is defined by √ L/C, where L is the inductance per unit length and C is the capacitance per unit length. As capacitance is added to the bus in the form of devices and interconnections, the bus characteristic impedance is lowered. This may result in signal reflections from the impedance mismatch between the unloaded and loaded segments of the bus.

If the number of loads is constant and can be distributed evenly along the line, reflections can be reduced by changing the bus termination resistors to match the loaded characteristic impedance. Normally, the number of loads are not constant or distributed evenly and the reflections resulting from any mismatching must be accounted for in the noise budget.