SLVSCG0 July 2014 TPS57114-EP
PRODUCTION DATA.
Frequency foldback and thermal shutdown protect the device during an overcurrent condition.
The SwitcherPro™ software tool, available at www.ti.com/switcherpro, supports the TPS57114-EP.
For more SWIFT™ documentation, see the TI website at www.ti.com/swift.
TPS57114-EP is a current mode controller used to support various topologies such as buck converter configuration.
Current mode control is a two-loop system. The switching power supply inductor is hidden within the inner current control loop. This simplifies the design of the outer voltage control loop and improves power supply performance in many ways, including better dynamics. The objective of this inner loop is to control the state-space averaged inductor current, but in practice, the instantaneous peak inductor current is the basis for control (switch current—equal to inductor current during the on time—is often sensed). If the inductor ripple current is small, peak inductor current control is nearly equivalent to average inductor current control.
The peak method of inductor current control functions by comparing the upslope of inductor current (or switch current) to a current program level set by the outer loop. The comparator turns the power switch off when the instantaneous current reaches the desired level. The current ramp is usually quite small compared to the programming level, especially when VIN is low. As a result, this method is extremely susceptible to noise. A noise spike is generated each time the switch turns on. A fraction of a volt coupled into the control circuit can cause it to turn off immediately, resulting in a subharmonic operating mode with much greater ripple. Circuit layout and bypassing are critically important to successful operation.
The peak current mode control method is inherently unstable at duty ratios exceeding 0.5, resulting in subharmonic oscillation. A compensating ramp (with slope equal to the inductor current downslope) is usually applied to the comparator input to eliminate this instability. Slope compensation must be added to the sensed current waveform or subtracted from the control voltage to ensure stability above a 50% duty cycle. A compensating ramp (with slope equal to the inductor current downslope) is usually applied to the comparator input to eliminate this instability. Current limit control design has numerous advantages: