SLUSEV9A August 2023 – September 2023 UCC14340-Q1
PRODUCTION DATA
Designing with the UCC14340-Q1 module is simple. First, choose single output or dual output. Determine the voltage for each output and then set the regulation through resistor dividers. Second, select the recommended input and output capacitors according to the procedure in the section of capacitor selection. The gate charge of the power device determines the amount of output decoupling capacitance needed at the gate driver input. Third, calculate the RLIM resistor value for regulating the (COM – VEE) voltage rail for a dual output according to the procedure in the section of RLIM or RDR selection.
For the dual output configuration, the VDD-to-VEE output capacitor placement and the RLIM-to-COM resistance introduce great impact to the power module performance and system BOM cost. Table 9-1 compares four combinations of two different VDD-to-VEE output decoupling capacitor placements and two RLIM current-limit networks. The number 1 ranking represents the best, and the number 4 means the worst. The table indicates that case B offers the best performance and case A offers the lowest BOM cost. As shown in Figure 9-8, COUT1 is the decoupling capacitor closest to VDD and VEE pins, while COUT1B is the decoupling capacitor closest to the output load. Besides, the current-limit resistor network between RLIM pin and COM terminal is called the RDR circuitry, which can program the charge and discharge current of RLIM regulator independently.
For the gate driver application with high di/dt current change as example, the finite impedance between the output terminal of power modules and the input bias terminal of output load greatly affects the transient response at the point of load, so the local decoupling capacitor COUT1B provides a very effective low-impedance decoupling for both VVDD-to-COM and VCOM-to-VEE in the driver switching condition. From the schematic aspect, it seems that adding COUT1B means one more extra capacitor, but the reality is that it helps to avoid the need of oversizing COUT2 and COUT3. With COUT1B, the reduced capacitance and capacitor body size for COUT2 and COUT3 end up a reduced total BOM cost on output capacitor bank. The following Section 9.2.2.1 will describe the design procedure of COUT1B for more detail. Another benefit is that when capacitance of COUT2 and COUT3 is reduced, a higher RLIM resistance can be used for COM-to-VEE regulation, so the power loss of RLIM regulator is reduced for higher power module efficiency.
COUT1B | RDR | Output Ripple | Efficiency | External BOM count/cost | |
Case A | Yes | No | 3 | 3 | 1 (Lowest) |
Case B | Yes | Yes | 1 (Lowest) | 1 (Highest) | 2 |
Case C | No | No | 4 | 4 | 3 |
Case D | No | Yes | 2 | 2 | 4 |
When the discharge switch turns on, the DLIM provides a unidirectional path to divert most of the RLIM-pin current back to RLIM2. This approach allows the RLIM regulator equipped with strong enough sinking capability to avoid the unbalanced current at COM-pin terminal from charging up VCOM-to-VEE away from regulation band. Since VCOM-to-VEE is lower than VVDD-to-VEE such as -5V respect to 25V as example, the power loss of the internal discharge switch and RLIM2 with larger switching current is less concern. On the contrary, if only one resistor is used to the RLIM pin, the resistor needs to design for worst case with lowest resistance to ensure VCOM-to-VEE regulation, so the efficiency will be compromised. For example, the RDR circuitry with RLIM1 of 1kΩ and RLIM2 of 51Ω can increase the converter efficiency 7% higher with 10mA load from VDD to COM and reduce the case temperature 10°C, compared with using one RLIM of 51Ω only.
Based on above, Case B is highly recommended as first choice in application. User can still use other thee design cases for other considerations. The design calculator provides a generic calculation tool to help user optimize each. The equations are based on the below detail descriptions.