JAJSKX8D December   2020  – October 2024 LMP7704-SP

PRODUCTION DATA  

  1.   1
  2. 特長
  3. アプリケーション
  4. 概要
  5. Pin Configuration and Functions
  6. Specifications
    1. 5.1 Absolute Maximum Ratings
    2. 5.2 ESD Ratings
    3. 5.3 Recommended Operating Conditions
    4. 5.4 Thermal Information
    5. 5.5 Electrical Characteristics VS = 5 V
    6. 5.6 Electrical Characteristics VS = 10 V
    7. 5.7 Typical Characteristics
  7. Detailed Description
    1. 6.1 Overview
    2. 6.2 Functional Block Diagram
    3. 6.3 Feature Description
      1. 6.3.1 Radiation Hardened Performance
      2. 6.3.2 Engineering Model (Devices With /EM Suffix)
      3. 6.3.3 Diodes Between the Inputs
      4. 6.3.4 Capacitive Load
      5. 6.3.5 Input Capacitance
    4. 6.4 Device Functional Modes
      1. 6.4.1 Precision Current Source
  8. Application and Implementation
    1. 7.1 Application Information
      1. 7.1.1 Low Input Voltage Noise
      2. 7.1.2 Total Noise Contribution
    2. 7.2 Typical Application
      1. 7.2.1 Design Requirements
      2. 7.2.2 Detailed Design Procedure
      3. 7.2.3 Application Curves
    3. 7.3 Power Supply Recommendations
    4. 7.4 Layout
      1. 7.4.1 Layout Guidelines
      2. 7.4.2 Layout Example
  9. Device and Documentation Support
    1. 8.1 Related Documentation
    2. 8.2 ドキュメントの更新通知を受け取る方法
    3. 8.3 サポート・リソース
    4. 8.4 Trademarks
    5. 8.5 静電気放電に関する注意事項
    6. 8.6 用語集
  10. Revision History
  11. 10Mechanical, Packaging, and Orderable Information

パッケージ・オプション

メカニカル・データ(パッケージ|ピン)
サーマルパッド・メカニカル・データ
発注情報

Input Capacitance

CMOS input stages inherently have low input bias current and higher input-referred voltage noise. The LMP7704-SP enhances this performance by having a low input bias current of only ±500 fA, as well as a very low input-referred voltage noise of 9 nV/√Hz. To achieve these specifications, a larger input stage is used. This larger input stage increases the input capacitance of the LMP7704-SP. The typical value of this input capacitance, CIN, for the LMP7704-SP is 25 pF. The input capacitance interacts with other impedances, such as gain and feedback resistors, which are seen on the inputs of the amplifier, to form a pole. This pole has little or no effect on the output of the amplifier at low frequencies and dc conditions, but plays a bigger role as the frequency increases. At higher frequencies, the presence of this pole decreases phase margin and also causes gain peaking. To compensate for the input capacitance, choose the feedback resistors carefully. In addition to being selective in picking values for the feedback resistor, add a capacitor to the feedback path to increase stability.

The dc gain of the circuit shown in Figure 6-3 is simply –R2/R1.

LMP7704-SP Compensating for Input
                    Capacitance Figure 6-3 Compensating for Input Capacitance

For the time being, ignore CF. The ac gain of the circuit in Figure 6-3 can be calculated as follows:

Equation 1. LMP7704-SP

This equation is rearranged to find the location of the two poles:

Equation 2. LMP7704-SP

Equation 2 shows that as values of R1 and R2 are increased, the magnitude of the poles is reduced, which in turn decreases the bandwidth of the amplifier. Whenever possible, the best practice is to choose smaller feedback resistors. Figure 6-4 shows the effect of the feedback resistor on the bandwidth of the LMP7704-SP.

LMP7704-SP Closed-Loop Gain vs
                    Frequency Figure 6-4 Closed-Loop Gain vs Frequency

Equation 2 has two poles. In most cases, the presence of pairs of poles causes gain peaking. To eliminate this effect, place the poles in a Butterworth position, because poles in a Butterworth position do not cause gain peaking. To achieve a Butterworth pair, set the quantity under the square root in Equation 2 to equal −1. Using this fact and the relation between R1 and R2 (R2 = −AV R1), the optimum value for R1 is found. Use Equation 3 to calculate the value of R1. If R1 is larger than this optimum value, gain peaking occurs.

Equation 3. LMP7704-SP

In Figure 6-3, CF is added to compensate for input capacitance and to increase stability. Additionally, CF reduces or eliminates the gain peaking that can be caused by having a larger feedback resistor. Figure 6-5 shows how CF reduces gain peaking.

LMP7704-SP Closed-Loop Gain vs Frequency
                    With Compensation Figure 6-5 Closed-Loop Gain vs Frequency With Compensation