SPRUIY8 October   2024 F29H850TU , F29H859TU-Q1 , TMS320C28341 , TMS320C28342 , TMS320C28343 , TMS320C28343-Q1 , TMS320C28344 , TMS320C28345 , TMS320C28346 , TMS320C28346-Q1

 

  1.   1
  2.   Abstract
  3.   Trademarks
  4. 1Introduction
  5. 2C28 to C29 CPU Migration
    1. 2.1 Use Cases
    2. 2.2 Key Differences
    3. 2.3 Source Code Migration
      1. 2.3.1 C/C++ Source Code
        1. 2.3.1.1 Pragmas and Attributes
        2. 2.3.1.2 Macros
        3. 2.3.1.3 Intrinsics
        4. 2.3.1.4 Inline assembly
        5. 2.3.1.5 Keywords
        6. 2.3.1.6 Data Type Differences
        7. 2.3.1.7 Tooling support for Migration
      2. 2.3.2 Assembly Language Source Code
    4. 2.4 Toolchain Migration
      1. 2.4.1 Compiler
      2. 2.4.2 Linker
      3. 2.4.3 CCS Project Migration
  6. 3CLA to C29 CPU Migration
    1. 3.1 Use Cases
    2. 3.2 Key Differences
    3. 3.3 Source Code Migration
      1. 3.3.1 C/C++ Source Code
        1. 3.3.1.1 Data Type Differences
        2. 3.3.1.2 Migrating CLAmath.h Functions and Intrinsics
        3. 3.3.1.3 Migrating C28 and CLA to the Same C29 CPU
        4. 3.3.1.4 Migrating C28 and CLA to Different C29 CPUs
      2. 3.3.2 Assembly Language Source Code
    4. 3.4 Toolchain Migration
  7. 4References

2.3.1.1 Pragmas and Attributes

  • The use of target-agnostic pragmas and attributes supported by clang are very likely to be portable, whereas a number of C28-specific pragmas and attributes will not be. See the compiler user guide for details.
  • The C29 compiler has a tool called c29clang-tidy which checks for use of C28 pragmas and suggest alternatives if available. This is discussed here (under c29migration-c28-pragmas)
  • The C29 Compiler user guide also discusses pragmas and attributes here and here