SPRUIY8 October   2024 F29H850TU , F29H859TU-Q1 , TMS320C28341 , TMS320C28342 , TMS320C28343 , TMS320C28343-Q1 , TMS320C28344 , TMS320C28345 , TMS320C28346 , TMS320C28346-Q1

 

  1.   1
  2.   Abstract
  3.   Trademarks
  4. 1Introduction
  5. 2C28 to C29 CPU Migration
    1. 2.1 Use Cases
    2. 2.2 Key Differences
    3. 2.3 Source Code Migration
      1. 2.3.1 C/C++ Source Code
        1. 2.3.1.1 Pragmas and Attributes
        2. 2.3.1.2 Macros
        3. 2.3.1.3 Intrinsics
        4. 2.3.1.4 Inline assembly
        5. 2.3.1.5 Keywords
        6. 2.3.1.6 Data Type Differences
        7. 2.3.1.7 Tooling support for Migration
      2. 2.3.2 Assembly Language Source Code
    4. 2.4 Toolchain Migration
      1. 2.4.1 Compiler
      2. 2.4.2 Linker
      3. 2.4.3 CCS Project Migration
  6. 3CLA to C29 CPU Migration
    1. 3.1 Use Cases
    2. 3.2 Key Differences
    3. 3.3 Source Code Migration
      1. 3.3.1 C/C++ Source Code
        1. 3.3.1.1 Data Type Differences
        2. 3.3.1.2 Migrating CLAmath.h Functions and Intrinsics
        3. 3.3.1.3 Migrating C28 and CLA to the Same C29 CPU
        4. 3.3.1.4 Migrating C28 and CLA to Different C29 CPUs
      2. 3.3.2 Assembly Language Source Code
    4. 3.4 Toolchain Migration
  7. 4References

3.3.2 Assembly Language Source Code

Any user code written in CLA assembly language does not port over to C29, since the instruction sets are different. Performance entitlement with the C29 VLIW architecture is expected with the C compiler, therefore users are strongly encouraged to write equivalent C code and take advantage of the C29 architecture's parallelism as well as the performance entitlement offered by the compiler.