SPRUJA3 November   2024 F29H850TU , F29H859TU-Q1

 

  1.   1
  2.   Abstract
  3.   Trademarks
  4. 1Feature Differences Between F2837x, F2838x, F28P65x and F29H85x
    1. 1.1 F28x to F29x Feature Change Overview
  5. 2C29x Architecture
    1. 2.1 C29x Architecture Overview
      1. 2.1.1 Peripheral Interrupt Priority and Expansion (PIPE)
      2. 2.1.2 Safety and Security Module (SSU)
      3. 2.1.3 Real-Time DMA (RTDMA)
      4. 2.1.4 Lock-step Compare Module (LCM)
    2. 2.2 C28x vs C29x Architecture Overview
  6. 3PCB Design Consideration
    1. 3.1 VSSOSC
    2. 3.2 JTAG
    3. 3.3 VREF
  7. 4Feature Differences for System Consideration
    1. 4.1 New Features in F29H85x
      1. 4.1.1  Analog Subsystem
      2. 4.1.2  Data Logger and Trace (DLT)
      3. 4.1.3  Single Edge Nibble Transmission (SENT)
      4. 4.1.4  Waveform Analyzer Diagnostic (WADI)
      5. 4.1.5  EPWM
      6. 4.1.6  Bootrom
      7. 4.1.7  ERAD
      8. 4.1.8  XBAR
      9. 4.1.9  Error Signaling Module (ESM)
      10. 4.1.10 Error Aggregator
      11. 4.1.11 Hardware Security Module (HSM)
        1. 4.1.11.1 Cryptographic Accelerators
      12. 4.1.12 Safe Interconnect End-to-End (E2E) Safing
      13. 4.1.13 Critical MMR Safing With Parity
      14. 4.1.14 LPOST
    2. 4.2 Communication Module Changes
    3. 4.3 Control Module Changes
    4. 4.4 Analog Module Differences
    5. 4.5 Power Management
      1. 4.5.1 VREGENZ
      2. 4.5.2 Power Consumption
    6. 4.6 Memory Module Changes
    7. 4.7 GPIO Multiplexing Changes
  8. 5Software Development with F29H85x
    1. 5.1 Migration Report Generation Tool
  9. 6References

4.5.2 Power Consumption

Total power for F28H85x is 1.8W where as F28P65x was 1.15kW. Power consumption is higher on F29H85x due to increased amount of resources on this devices such as CPUs (1-3 C29x depending on the package, Cortex M4) as well as larger memory which consume more current.