• Menu
  • Product
  • Email
  • PDF
  • Order now
  • MSPM0 MCU Advantages in Automotive Application

    • SPRADP9 March   2025 MSPM0G1519 , MSPM0G3106 , MSPM0G3107 , MSPM0G3506 , MSPM0G3507 , MSPM0G3519

       

  • CONTENTS
  • SEARCH
  • MSPM0 MCU Advantages in Automotive Application
  1.   1
  2.   2
  3.   Trademarks
  4. IMPORTANT NOTICE
search No matches found.
  • Full reading width
    • Full reading width
    • Comfortable reading width
    • Expanded reading width
  • Card for each section
  • Card with all content

 

Technical White Paper

MSPM0 MCU Advantages in Automotive Application

The global automotive industry is undergoing a once-in-a-century technological revolution. According to Strategy Analytics, automotive electronics now account for over 35% of total vehicle costs in 2024, a figure projected to exceed 50% by 2024. This transformation is driven by two core forces:

  • Electrification: Global sales of new energy vehicles (NEVs) surpassed 14 million units in 2024, with China’s market penetration reaching 35% (data from CAAM). This surge has dramatically increased demand for high-reliability MCUs in powertrain systems (battery, motor, and control).
  • Intelligence: Over 30% of vehicles now feature L2+ autonomous driving capabilities, while smart cockpits and vehicle connectivity have become mainstream, pushing annual computing power demand for chips to grow by more than 20%.

MCUs: The "Invisible Battleground": The number of MCUs per vehicle has risen from 70 in traditional ICE vehicles to 300+ in smart vehicles, with the automotive-grade MCU market expected to reach $12 billion by 2025 (Yole Développement).

 Expanding Use of MCUs in
                    Automotive Figure 1-1 Expanding Use of MCUs in Automotive

The "Three Barriers" of Automotive-Grade Chips

Automotive electronics fundamentally differ from consumer electronics in their extreme demands for functional safety, reliability, and supply chain resilience:

  1. Functional Safety: ISO 26262 and ASIL Levels
    1. Safety Baseline: ASIL B has become the entry threshold for body control and comfort systems. For example, power window anti-pinch failures can cause physical harm, requiring ≥90% single-point fault coverage.
  2. Reliability: AEC-Q100 Certification
    1. Rigorous Testing: Includes 2,000-hour high-temperature aging (125°C), 1,000 thermal cycles (-55°C to approximately 150°C), and mechanical vibration (50G acceleration).
    2. Lifetime Requirements: Automotive chips must maintain 10+ years of service with a failure rate below 1 FIT (1 failure per billion hours).
  3. Supply Chain Resilience: Independent Production Line
    1. Long-Term Commitment: Vehicle development cycles span 3-5 years, requiring chips to maintain 15+ years of stable supply.

MSPM0’s Advantages in Automotive Applications

Tailored for medium-to-low-risk scenarios (ASIL A/B), MSPM0 redefines the body electronics market with safety, affordability, and ease of development:

  • Balancing Safety and Cost:
    • Meet ISO 26262 standards. The TI new-product development process features many elements necessary to manage systematic faults. Additionally, the documentation and reports for these components can be used to assist with compliance to a wide range of standards for customer’s end applications including automotive and industrial systems.
    • Achieves ASIL B via single-core self-test architecture, reducing hardware costs by 40% compared to competitor products.
    • Provide MCAL which is a core component of the Basic Software Layer defined in the AUTOSAR standard. And the AUTOSAR is provided by third party like EB Tresos. AUTOSAR’s modular and layered architecture natively aligns with ISO 26262 safety requirements, and their combined use empowers the creation of secure, reusable automotive electronic systems with high efficiency.
    • AEC-Q100 Grade 1( –40°C to 125°C) qualified. Customer can submit request to get the report from TI Production Part Approval Process (PPAP) site.
    • Meet ISO 9001 / IATF 16949 standards. The MSPM0 MCU was developed using TI’s new product development process which has been certified as compliant to ISO 9001 / IATF 16949 as assessed by Bureau Veritas (BV).
  • Strong Open Ecosystem For Easy Development:
    • Compatibility for CCS/Keil/IAR development environments. Green Hills MULTI IDE also supports INTEGRITY, AUTOSAR Classic and u-velOSity.
    • Support multiple programmers like XDS-110, Segger J-link, PEMicro Cyclone, C-GANG and etc..
    • Abundant drivers and librarys support by the 3rd party to meet different application requirements like Secure boot library, CAN/LIN stack library, AUTOSAR software and etc..
  • TI's Own Supply Chain Resilience:
    • Manufactured using Lehi’s 300-millimeter wafer fab, maintain stable production capacity.
    • Dedicated automotive chip warehouses in Shanghai cut delivery lead times to several weeks.
    • Long term commitment over 15 years of stable supply.
     TI Lehi Wafer
                            Fab Figure 1-2 TI Lehi Wafer Fab

ISO 26262 Standards Compliance Flow

Table 1-1 ISO 26262 Standards Compliance Flow
ISO 26262
Standards Compliance Flow 1. ASIL Level: Define safety integrity level.
2. Functional Safety Manual: Guides development processes, defines safety goals and mechanisms.
3. FMEDA: Quantitatively verifies ASIL Level compliance.
4. FIT: Validates ASIL Level random hardware failure probability targets.

ISO 26262 is the international functional safety standard for automotive electronics, designed to systematically reduce safety risks caused by failures in electrical/electronic (E/E) systems. Key aspects include:

  • Scope: Covers the entire life cycle of E/E systems in passenger vehicles, from concept design to production, operation, and decommissioning.
  • Objective: Ensure systems maintain a safe state even in the presence of random hardware failures or systematic errors.
  • Structure: Divided into 10 parts (Part 1–Part 10), addressing safety management, system-level development, hardware/software development, and more.

ASIL A-D is a risk classification system defined in ISO 26262 to quantify the rigor of safety requirements for systems or functions.

Table 1-2 ASIL Levels
Level Risk Requirement Typical Applications
ASIL A Lowest Sunroof control, ambient lighting
ASIL B Medium Instrument cluster, anti-pinch windows
ASIL C High Brake assist, battery management
ASIL D Highest Autonomous driving, electric power steering

Functional Safety Manual is a compliance guide for product development teams, typically provided by chip manufacturers. Below are the key contents in a Functional Safety Manual.

  1. Safety Goals:
    1. Define target ASIL levels and requirements (SPFM ≥90% for ASIL B).
  2. Safety Mechanisms:
    1. Hardware: ECC memory, dual-core lockstep.
    2. Software: Watchdog timers, periodic self-tests.
  3. Development Process:
    1. Safety analysis (FMEA/FTA), traceability matrices.
    2. Tool chain certification (TÜV-certified compilers).

FMEDA is a quantitative analysis method mandated by ISO 26262 to evaluate hardware safety performance. This analysis method usually includes the following steps:

  1. Failure Mode Identification: List potential hardware faults open/short circuits).
  2. Impact Analysis: Assess safety consequences (brake signal loss).
  3. Diagnostic Coverage Calculation: Measure fault detection rates (ECC covers 90% of memory faults).
  4. Metrics:
    1. Single-Point Fault Metric (SPFM): ≥90% (ASIL B), ≥99% (ASIL D).
    2. Latent Fault Metric (LFM): ≥60% (ASIL B), ≥80% (ASIL D).
Table 1-3 FMEDA Report Example
Component Failure Mode Diagnostic Coverage ASIL Compliance
CPU Core Instruction error 99% ASIL D
SRAM Bit-flip 95% ASIL B
ADC Module Sampling drift 80% ASIL A

FIT is a critical metric for measuring the reliability of electronic components or systems. It is widely used in high-safety industries such as automotive and aerospace, particularly in ISO 26262 functional safety to quantify random hardware failure rates.

1 FIT represents the probability of a component failing once per billion hours of operation. ISO 26262 mandates limits on the Probabilistic Metric for Hardware Failures (PMHF) based on ASIL levels:

  • ASIL D: PMHF ≤ 10 FIT (≤10 failures per billion hours).
  • ASIL B: PMHF ≤ 100 FIT.

As a summary, ISO 26262 provides the framework, while ASIL defines its implementation rigor. The Functional Safety Manual guides theory into practice, with FMEDA and FIT offering quantitative validation. For ASIL B MCUs (MSPM0), focus on balancing safety (SPFM ≥90%) and cost efficiency.

ISO 26262 Technical Implementation Path

Table 1-4 ISO 26262 Technical Implementation Path
ISO 26262
Technical Implementation Path 1. AUTOSAR: an automotive software architecture standard aimed at software component reusability and cross-platform compatibility.
1.1 MCAL: Provides hardware access for the Safety Library, directly impacting FMEDA results.
2. Safety Library: Delivers software-level safety mechanisms, usually integrated into AUTOSAR.

AUTOSAR (Automotive Open System Architecture) is an open standard for automotive E/E software architecture developed collaboratively by leading automakers, suppliers, and tool developers. Its core goal is to decouple software from hardware in traditional automotive development, enabling modular software design, cross-platform reusability, and efficient collaborative development.

Traditional automotive software development faced challenges such as: Incompatible ECU software from different suppliers led to high integration costs. Advanced features (autonomous driving, OTA) demanded more flexible architectures. Systematic compliance with standards like ISO 26262 was difficult. AUTOSAR's solution solves these challenges by standardized interfaces and a layered architecture decouple software from hardware, allowing software components to be combined like building blocks.

A common core architecture of AUTOSAR shows the following:

  • Application Layer:
    • Implements vehicle-specific functions (engine control, lighting).
    • Developers focus on business logic without hardware dependencies.
  • Runtime Environment (RTE):
    • Provides communication interfaces (signal passing, service calls), isolating applications from hardware.
  • Basic Software Layer (BSW):
    • Standardized service modules, including:
      • Services Layer: diagnostics, memory management.
      • ECU Abstraction Layer: unified access to sensors/actuators.
      • MCAL: low-level hardware drivers for ADC, CAN, and so forth.

Microcontroller Abstraction Layer (MCAL) is a core component of the BSW (Basic Software Layer) defined in the AUTOSAR standard. Its primary purpose is to abstract hardware operations, providing a unified interface for upper software layers (application layer, ECU abstraction layer) to access hardware, thereby shielding differences between microcontrollers (MCUs).

Core functions of MCAL shows below:

  • Hardware Driver Encapsulation:
  • Standardized drivers (ADC, PWM, CAN, SPI, GPIO) directly interact with MCU registers but expose uniform APIs to upper layers.
  • Hardware Independence:
  • Switching MCUs requires only modifying the MCAL layer, leaving upper application logic unchanged.
  • Real-Time Performance and Safety:
  • Ensures timing reliability for hardware operations and supports ISO 26262 functional safety requirements (fault detection, redundancy checks).

Safety Library comprises pre-integrated software modules for real-time hardware fault detection and safety responses. The safety library usually integrated in AUTOSAR project. At the same time, customers can use the safety library independently in their project to meet custom function safety requirements.

Table 1-5 Safety Library Functions and Implementation
Diagnostic Type Target ASIL Requirement
CPU Self-Test Register/instruction anomalies ASIL B/D
Memory Diagnostics SRAM/Flash bit-flips (ECC) ASIL B
Peripheral Monitoring ADC/PWM failures ASIL A/B
Communication Checks CAN/LIN CRC errors ASIL B

AEC-Q100 Standard

The AEC-Q100 standard, established by the Automotive Electronics Council, defines reliability certifications for integrated circuits (ICs) to make sure their long-term stability in harsh automotive environments. Grade 0 and Grade 1 are two critical temperature grades under AEC-Q100, differing primarily in operating temperature range, application scenarios, and test rigor. Below is a detailed comparison:

Table 1-6 Differences between AEC-Q100 Grade 0 and Grade 1
Criteria Grade 0 Grade 1
Operating Temperature Range -40℃ to approximately +150℃ -40℃ to approximately +125℃
Typical Applications Engine compartments, transmissions, turbochargers Body control, infotainment systems, dashboards
Test Rigor Higher (longer high-temperature aging) Moderate
Cost Higher (specialized materials/processes) Lower
Market Share ~15% (high-end/high-power) ~70% (mainstream automotive ICs)

Below is the common application scenarios for Grade 0 and Grade 1 due to the different requirement.

  • Grade 0 Applications
    • Powertrain Systems: Fuel injection control, motor drivers (electric power steering).
    • High-Temperature Sensors: Exhaust gas temperature sensors, turbocharger pressure sensors.
    • High-Power Chips: Power MOSFETs, IGBT drivers.
  • Grade 1 Applications
    • Body Electronics: Window lifters, seat adjusters, lighting control.
    • Infotainment Systems: Navigation, voice recognition, display drivers.
    • Low-Power Modules: Tire pressure monitoring systems (TPMS), passive entry/passive start (PEPS).

Resources

Please reach out to the sales team and ask for the above documents if you require any of them to develop your project.

  • Texas Instruments, Functional Safety Manual for MSPM0G, functional safety manual.
  • Texas Instruments, Functional Safety, function safety resources website.
  • Texas Instruments, MCAL Access Link, MCAL.
  • Texas Instruments, EB Tools Access Link, EB Tools.

Trademarks

All trademarks are the property of their respective owners.

IMPORTANT NOTICE AND DISCLAIMER

TI PROVIDES TECHNICAL AND RELIABILITY DATA (INCLUDING DATASHEETS), DESIGN RESOURCES (INCLUDING REFERENCE DESIGNS), APPLICATION OR OTHER DESIGN ADVICE, WEB TOOLS, SAFETY INFORMATION, AND OTHER RESOURCES “AS IS” AND WITH ALL FAULTS, AND DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS AND IMPLIED, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR NON-INFRINGEMENT OF THIRD PARTY INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS.

These resources are intended for skilled developers designing with TI products. You are solely responsible for (1) selecting the appropriate TI products for your application, (2) designing, validating and testing your application, and (3) ensuring your application meets applicable standards, and any other safety, security, or other requirements. These resources are subject to change without notice. TI grants you permission to use these resources only for development of an application that uses the TI products described in the resource. Other reproduction and display of these resources is prohibited. No license is granted to any other TI intellectual property right or to any third party intellectual property right. TI disclaims responsibility for, and you will fully indemnify TI and its representatives against, any claims, damages, costs, losses, and liabilities arising out of your use of these resources.

TI’s products are provided subject to TI’s Terms of Sale (www.ti.com/legal/termsofsale.html) or other applicable terms available either on ti.com or provided in conjunction with such TI products. TI’s provision of these resources does not expand or otherwise alter TI’s applicable warranties or warranty disclaimers for TI products.

Mailing Address: Texas Instruments, Post Office Box 655303, Dallas, Texas 75265 

Copyright © 2025, Texas Instruments Incorporated

 

Texas Instruments

© Copyright 1995-2025 Texas Instruments Incorporated. All rights reserved.
Submit documentation feedback | IMPORTANT NOTICE | Trademarks | Privacy policy | Cookie policy | Terms of use | Terms of sale