SBOA580 November 2023 INA1620 , OPA1602 , OPA1604 , OPA1611 , OPA1612 , OPA1612-Q1 , OPA1622 , OPA1632 , OPA1655 , OPA1656 , OPA209 , OPA210 , OPA211 , OPA211-EP , OPA2209 , OPA2210 , OPA2211-EP , OPA2211-HT , OPA2211A
Important observations can be made between the inverting and non-inverting application circuits. In the non-inverting configuration Vin , Vn, and Vos are all applied to the non-inverting terminal and the signal gain is equal to the noise gain. In the inverting configuration the signal is applied to the inverting terminal while Vn and Vos are applied to the non-inverting terminal. The signal gain is not equal to the noise gain in the inverting configuration. With the assigned resistor values in Table 3-2 and Table 3-2 the THD + N gain differs by a factor of or 6 dB between the inverting and non-inverting configurations. The difference of 6 dB between these two measurements is shown in Figure 3-12. The output referred THD + N measurement is always worse for the inverting configuration when configured in the same signal gain as the non-inverting configuration. Although the THD + N is worse, the benefit of the inverting configuration is that non-inverting terminal is fixed to a DC potential as seen in Figure 3-8 and provides a fixed common mode voltage. This results in a CMRR benefit for the inverting configuration when the op amp has low CMRR.