SLOA294A June   2020  – April 2024 TPS3851-Q1 , TPS7A16A-Q1

 

  1.   1
  2.   Abstract
  3.   Trademarks
  4. Introduction
  5. Types of Faults and Quantitative Random Hardware Failure Metrics
  6. Random Failures Over a Product Lifetime and Estimation of BFR
  7. BFR Estimation Techniques
  8. Siemens SN 29500 FIT model
  9. IEC TR 62380
  10. Recommended Assumptions for BFR Calculations
  11. Special Considerations for Transient Faults
  12. BFR Differences (Due to Package) Between IEC TR 62380 and SN 29500
  13. 10Effect of Power-on Hours on BFR
  14. 11What Can You Expect for TI Products
  15. 12Summary
  16. 13References
  17. 14Revision History

BFR Differences (Due to Package) Between IEC TR 62380 and SN 29500

SN 29500 is deficient (vs. IEC TR 62380) in accounting for failures that are due to silicon and package interactions. Consequently, functional safety standards recommend that:

  • Semiconductor component manufacturers estimate failures caused by silicon interaction with package materials and silicon-to-package connection points (pins)
  • System integrators account for failures attributable to the connection points between the semiconductor component and the boards (solder joints). These failures are typically analyzed at the element or system level.
  • ISO 26262 defines:
    • An element as a system, components (hardware or software), hardware parts, or software units; and
    • A system as a set of components or subsystems that relates at least a sensor, a controller and an actuator with one another.

IEC TR 62380 accounts for both the interaction between silicon die and the lead frame/substrate and the connection between solder joints. In contrast, the package failure rate in SN 29500 only considers die-to-package interactions, which leads to inherent optimism in BFR estimations when using SN 29500.