SLOA339 July   2024 TAS2764 , TAS2764 , TAS2780 , TAS2780 , TAS2781 , TAS2781

 

  1.   1
  2.   Abstract
  3.   Trademarks
  4. 1Introduction
    1. 1.1 Capacitor Only Connected at the Class-D Outputs
    2. 1.2 LC Filter Connected at the Class-D Outputs
    3. 1.3 Ferrite Bead Filters
  5. 2EMI Filter Considerations
    1. 2.1 Impedance Consideration of EMI Filter
    2. 2.2 Device Reliability Constraint for High Output Voltage
    3. 2.3 EMI Filter Current Reliability
  6. 3Post Filter Feedback
  7. 4Loop Stability With Post Filter Feedback
  8. 5User Guide: EMI Filter Modeling and Post Filter Feedback Validation Tool
  9. 6Summary
  10. 7References

Ferrite Bead Filters

Ferrite beads are relatively low cost and non-linear EMI filters. The impedance of the ferrite bead changes significantly with the current through the ferrite bead, which makes this component non-linear. The ferrite bead can be modeled as a resistor parallel with an inductor, which damps the resonance and reduces extremely high current.

 Ferrite Bead Equivalent
                    Model Figure 1-1 Ferrite Bead Equivalent Model

The inductor in the filter can be realized using a ferrite bead, which is a lot more cost optimum compared to a regular inductor, but comes with non-linearities. Using the cost-optimum ferrite beads degrades the THD performance of the audio after the filter, affecting the audio performance of the end system. Such concerns force the customers to go back to an inductor-based filter, or use a more expensive ferrite bead which doesn’t degrade the THD performance, increasing the cost of the end system. Another concern with using a filter at output of class-D amplifier is that the filter degrades the frequency response of the output depending upon the cut-off frequency selected for the filter. This too affects the audio performance across frequencies.

Table 1-1 compares cost of different inductors and ferrite beads. TI’s Post filter feedback configuration allows usage of MPZ1608S221A and 2506036017Y2 kind of ferrite beads which is significantly lower cost design, without the performance degradation associated with these components.

Table 1-1 Comparison of Inductive Filters (As of June 2024)
Part Number Type 9k unit price Performance
MAKK2016TR24M Inductor 3.1c High
NFZ2MSM181SN10L Ferrite bead 11.1c High
MPZ1608S221A Ferrite bead 2.1c Low
2506036017Y2 Ferrite bead 1.9c Low