SLVAEG1A August   2019  – May 2021 TLV62568 , TLV62568A , TPS62840

 

  1.   Trademarks
  2. 1Introduction
  3. 2Highlighted Products
  4. 3Buck Converter Architectures
  5. 4Testing Setup
  6. 5Testing Results
  7. 6Results Summary
  8. 7Further Reading
  9. 8Revision History

Results Summary

The results and observations for each architecture are summarized below. Pros and cons are listed, with regards to battery-powered devices targeting low IQ, high efficiency at all load levels, and high output voltage accuracy.

ArchitectureProsCons
A: Buck Converter + LDO
  • Noise reduction at select, typically lower, frequencies (high speed peripherals OFF)
  • Cascaded LDOs with single switching converter give similar ripple rejection
  • Low light and full load efficiency
  • Limited ripple rejection across a higher frequency bandwidth, requiring a larger output capacitor
  • Thermal performance
B: FPWM Buck Converter
  • Fixed output ripple voltage across load variations
  • Better transient response for large load changes
  • High full load efficiency
  • Simple solution
  • Extremely low light load efficiency
  • IQ (FPWM devices typically in mA range of IQ)
C: Buck Converter + PI Filter
  • Very high light & full load efficiency
  • Strong noise attenuation at higher switching frequencies (high speed peripherals ON)
  • Dependency of PI filter on load conditions/range
  • Limited low frequency rejection for PFM voltage ripple