SLVAF01 October   2020 TPS55340

 

  1.   Trademarks
  2. 1Switching Node Voltage Stress from Flyback
    1. 1.1 Reflected Voltage, VOR
    2. 1.2 Leakage Inductance Factor
  3. 2Mitigating Voltage Spike on Switch Node
    1. 2.1 Zener or TVS Clamping
    2. 2.2 Forward Recovery Characteristic of Blocking Diode
  4. 3Design Example with TPS55340
    1. 3.1 Initial Key Designs and Test Results
    2. 3.2 Redesign Procedure to Mitigate Vsw
    3. 3.3 Using Blocking Diode that has a good Tfr
  5. 4Summary
  6. 5References

Reflected Voltage, VOR

In a typical flyback converter, there is voltage which is reflected from secondary side when the primary side switch is turned off and the stored energy is transferring to the load through transformer. This reflected voltage, VOR will form voltage stress to the switching device after adding maximum input VDC, VIN in worst case. So the amplitude of the reflected voltage, VOR will be a key design factor, affecting voltage stress to the switching device.

Equation 1. GUID-20201006-CA0I-FNM6-6ZNT-QSB7ZKBBKJSF-low.png

From the simple equation above, VOR is set by primary to secondary turn ratio once output voltage is set. And then Flyback controller or convert will set its’ duty ratio by inductor’s volt-sec balance if VOR is fixed. Figure 1-1 shows the comparison voltage and current stress according to VOR level.

GUID-20200927-CA0I-3W0W-CFBB-KKZ0DHBWKXX9-low.png Figure 1-1 Flyback Converter's Primary Side Current, Voltage, and Switch Note Voltage

By adjusting turn ratio, VOR could be contained if it tops a limited level that is required by system. But a lower VOR will cause a higher peak current stress and make system have lower efficiency due to an increased conduction loss. Also, it is possible for higher peak to trigger internal current limit of the device which integrates FET inside.