SLVAFW4 August 2024
This application brief highlights the forward converter. The output power range of this topology is typically between 100W and 250W. For output power above this level, a better design is possible using a push-pull or half-bridge topology for increased efficiency. These topologies are the topic of the next installations in this series.
The single-switch forward topology can step the input voltage up and down, generating an isolated output voltage that can be positive or negative. When switch Q1 is conducting, energy is transferred from the primary to the secondary. Winding Nd and diode D3 provide a path to reset the transformer during demagnetization time. Diode D2 provides a freewheeling path when switch Q1 is not conducting. Figure 1 is a schematic of a nonsynchronous single-switch forward converter.
Equation 1 calculates the duty cycle in continuous conduction mode (CCM) as:
where
The maximum duty cycle is limited to 50% as the transformer needs sufficient time to be reset through the demagnetization winding.
Equation 2 calculates the maximum metal-oxide semiconductor field-effect transistor (MOSFET) stress as:
where
The uncertain coupling of the transformer creates an additional voltage spike caused by the excess energy stored in the leakage inductance. Therefore, choose a voltage rating for Q1 that includes a reasonable margin.
Equation 3 gives the maximum rectifier diode stress as:
where
Equation 4 gives the maximum freewheeling diode stress as:
where
As the forward converter can be seen as a buck converter with a transformer, this converter family also has a continuous output current due to the output LC-filter and the freewheeling path through diode D2. Like a buck converter, the forward converter has a pulsed current at the input. This fact leads to rather high voltage ripple at the converter input. For electromagnetic compatibility, additional input filtering is likely necessary. If the converter needs to supply a very sensitive load, a second-stage filter at the output can help damp the output voltage ripple.
A single-switch forward converter can be built by using a boost or general-purpose pulse-width modulation (PWM) controller integrated circuit (IC), as this converter only requires a low-side gate driver.
In terms of dynamic behavior, an optocoupler in the isolated feedback path is the primary limiting factor of the achievable regulation bandwidth for the forward converter. If a high regulation bandwidth is required, the PWM controller can be placed on the secondary side of the converter.
Figure 2 through Figure 11 show voltage and current waveforms in CCM for FET Q1, primary transformer winding Np, rectifier diode D1, freewheeling diode D2, and inductor L1 in a nonsynchronous single-switch forward converter.
For high-input voltage levels, a two-switch forward configuration can be leveraged, which enables the use of MOSFETs with a lower breakdown voltage and better performance parameters because the MOSFETs share the overall voltage stress. Figure 12 shows the schematic of a two-switch forward converter. The advantage of using two switches is that demagnetization can be achieved by having two clamping diodes to VIN and GND, allowing the removal of the demagnetization winding. To drive the two switches at the same time, with one of them being on the high-side, a half-bridge gate driver without interlock can be used in combination with a standard PWM controller.
Equation 5 calculates the maximum MOSFET stress in a two-switch forward converter as:
where
This equation assumes that voltage stress is evenly distributed among the two MOSFETs. due to board and component parasitics as well as device parameter tolerances. Under certain circumstances the voltage stress is not distributed so evenly due to board and component parasitics as well as device parameter tolerances. Select a MOSFET breakdown voltage with sufficient margin to avoid fatal device failure.
Equation 6 gives the maximum rectifier diode stress as:
where
Equation 1 and Equation 4 are also applicable for the two-switch forward converter.
Also, with two-switch configuration, the maximum duty cycle is limited to 50% as the transformer needs sufficient time to be reset through the demagnetization diodes.
Figure 13 through Figure 22 show voltage and current waveforms in CCM for FET Q1, primary transformer winding Np, rectifier diode D1, freewheeling diode D2, and inductor L1 in a nonsynchronous two-switch forward converter.
A third option to configure this topology is to use an active-clamp circuit on the primary side to recover energy from the leakage inductance of the transformer and feed the energy back to the input capacitor, boosting efficiency and enabling larger output power levels than the other two configurations. The active-clamp configuration also allows duty cycles larger than 50%. Figure 23 shows the schematic of a nonsynchronous active-clamp forward converter using an N-channel MOSFET for the clamping circuit.
Figure 24 through Figure 35 show voltage and current waveforms in CCM for FET Q1, FET Q2, primary transformer winding Np, rectifier diode D1, freewheeling diode D2, and inductor L1 in a nonsynchronous active-clamp forward converter.
Depending on the application, there are two different options to feed back the isolated output voltage to the controller:
Using synchronous rectification for load currents over 3A is advisable, especially when efficiency needs to be high or when external heat sinks need to be avoided. The synchronous rectifier can either be controlled from the primary side or use a self-driven concept, with the latter typically the more cost-effective option.