SNVAA84 October   2023 LMR36506

 

  1.   1
  2.   Abstract
  3.   Trademarks
  4. 1Introduction
    1. 1.1 Topology Selection
    2. 1.2 From Buck to Fly-Buck-Boost Converter
  5. 2Specific Implementation of the Fly-Buck-Boost Converter
    1. 2.1 Schematic
    2. 2.2 Bill of Materials
  6. 3Test Results
    1. 3.1 Start-up Behavior
    2. 3.2 System Loop Stability
    3. 3.3 Thermal Behavior
    4. 3.4 VOUT Ripple and SW Node Waveforms
    5. 3.5 Efficiency Data
      1. 3.5.1 Efficiency Data for Balanced Loads
      2. 3.5.2 Efficiency Data for Unbalanced Loads
    6. 3.6 Load Regulation
      1. 3.6.1 Load Regulation for Balanced Loads
      2. 3.6.2 Load Regulation for Unbalanced Loads
  7. 4Summary
  8. 5References

Topology Selection

Multiple topologies and designs are available for providing a positive (Pos VOUT) and a negative voltage (Neg VOUT) rail from a positive input voltage (VIN). For example, there are dedicated devices containing a boost converter plus an inverting buck-boost converter (TPS65130, TPS65131, TPS65133), devices with boost or LDO plus negative charge pump (TPS65132, LM27762), but also single inductor multiple output split-rail converters (TPS65135). Aside from these devices, designers can also choose from several topologies and related devices typically used for isolated power conversion.1 These devices are also used for non-isolated applications as well. Open loop push-pull (SN6501, SN6505, SN6507) or LLC (UCC25800) devices belong to this category as well as primary-side-regulated flyback.2 Furthermore, the use of buck converters in fly-buck or fly-buck-boost topology is a possible solution.

The latter two devices have the advantage of choosing devices from a huge buck converter portfolio and of being usable for applications with a wide VIN tolerance range. The use of these device is also supported by a range of off-the-shelf coupled inductors offered by different inductor vendors. The largest offering of those off-the-shelf inductors is available for a turns ratio of 1:1, enabling straight-forward inductor selection but leading also to specific limitations in regards of the desired designed for duty cycle.

Both topologies generate a very well-regulated non-isolated primary output voltage; with a positive output for fly-buck and negative output for fly-buck-boost. The secondary output voltage is usually an isolated output voltage, by following the voltage on the primary side. The energy transfer to the secondary side takes place during the off-time of a switching cycle and leads to a desired duty cycle of less than 50%; leaving more than 50% of the period time available for the energy transfer to the secondary side. Considering the preferable use of a 1:1 coupled inductor, this requirement can be fulfilled for the fly-buck for a VINmin > 2 × VOUT, while the fly-buck-boost is able to fulfill this requirement already for a VINmin > VOUT. Based on these considerations a fly-buck can need a minimum VIN of 30 V to generate the ±15 V, while a fly-buck-boost is able to work with a minimum VIN of 15 V.