SPRACM9B June   2019  – November 2020 F29H850TU , F29H859TU-Q1 , TMS320F28384D , TMS320F28384S , TMS320F28386D , TMS320F28386S , TMS320F28388D , TMS320F28388S , TMS320F28P650DH , TMS320F28P650DK , TMS320F28P650SH , TMS320F28P650SK , TMS320F28P659DH-Q1 , TMS320F28P659DK-Q1 , TMS320F28P659SH-Q1

 

  1.   Trademarks
  2. 1 Introduction
    1. 1.1 Acronyms Used in This Document
  3. 2 Benefits of the TMS320F2838x MCU for High-Bandwidth Current Loop
  4. 3 Current Loops in Servo Drives
  5. 4 Outline of the Fast Current Loop Library
  6. 5 Fast Current Loop Evaluation
    1. 5.1 Evaluation Setup
      1. 5.1.1 Hardware
      2. 5.1.2 Software
      3. 5.1.3 FCL With T-Format Type Position Encoder
        1. 5.1.3.1 Connecting T-Format Encoder to IDDK
        2. 5.1.3.2 T-Format Interface Software
        3. 5.1.3.3 T-Format Encoder Latency Considerations
      4. 5.1.4 SDFM
      5. 5.1.5 Incremental System Build
  7. 6 Incremental Build Level 1
    1. 6.1 SVGEN Test
    2. 6.2 Testing SVGEN With DACs
    3. 6.3 Inverter Functionality Verification
  8. 7 Incremental Build Level 2
    1. 7.1 Setting the Overcurrent Limit in the Software
    2. 7.2 Current Sense Method
    3. 7.3 Voltage Sense Method
    4. 7.4 Setting Current Regulator Limits
    5. 7.5 Verification of Current Sense
    6. 7.6 Position Encoder Feedback
      1. 7.6.1 Speed Observer and Position Estimator
      2. 7.6.2 Verification of Position Encoder Orientation
  9. 8 Incremental Build Level 3
    1. 8.1 Observation One – PWM Update Latency
      1. 8.1.1 From the Expressions Window
      2. 8.1.2 From the Scope Plot
  10. 9 Incremental Build Level 4
    1. 9.1 Observation
  11. 10Incremental Build Level 5
  12. 11Incremental Build Level 6
    1. 11.1 Integrating SFRA Library
    2. 11.2 Initial Setup Before Starting SFRA
    3. 11.3 SFRA GUIs
    4. 11.4 Setting Up the GUIs to Connect to Target Platform
    5. 11.5 Running the SFRA GUIs
    6. 11.6 Influence of Current Feedback SNR
    7. 11.7 Inferences
      1. 11.7.1 Bandwidth Determination From Closed Loop Plot
      2. 11.7.2 Phase Margin Determination From Open Loop Plot
      3. 11.7.3 Maximum Modulation Index Determination From PWM Update Time
      4. 11.7.4 Voltage Decoupling in Current Loop
    8. 11.8 Phase Margin vs Gain Crossover Frequency
  13. 12Incremental Build Level 7
    1. 12.1 Run the Code on CPU1 to Allocate ECAT to CM
    2. 12.2 Run the Code on CM to Setup ECAT
    3. 12.3 Setup TwinCAT
    4. 12.4 Scanning for EtherCAT Devices via TwinCAT
    5. 12.5 Program ControlCard EEPROM for ESC
    6. 12.6 Running the Application
  14. 13Incremental Build Level 8
    1. 13.1 Run the Code on CPU1 to Allocate ECAT to CM
    2. 13.2 Run the Code on CM to Setup ECAT
    3. 13.3 Running the Application
  15. 14References
  16. 15Revision History

11.8 Phase Margin vs Gain Crossover Frequency

By varying the control bandwidth and repeating these tests and noting down the resulting gain cross over frequency and phase margin, a set of plots are obtained for Id loop as shown in Figure 11-10. Two sets of tests are performed, one based on classical current control method, and the other based on FCL. Both these tests were performed using different current regulators. They all gave converging results.

GUID-9627E37F-CFDD-40D0-9FD5-ED230E8C4A8A-low.png Figure 11-10 Plot of Gain Cross over Frequency vs Phase Margin as Experimentally Obtained

The group of plots at the bottom is obtained for conventional control, and it is obvious that the gain cross over frequency is too low and that as the gain cross over frequency is increased, the phase margin drops a lot faster.

The group of plots at the top is obtained with FCL. The gain cross over frequency is nearly thrice that of the classical method for a given phase margin. And also, as the gain cross over frequency is increased, the relative drop in phase margin is very low compared to the classical method. This effectively means that FCL can provide a higher bandwidth or gain cross over frequency at a higher phase margin.