This pre-regulated isolated open-loop LLC transformer driver converter provides four 18-V outputs up to a total of 6 W for traction-inverter applications. The LLC topology allows the transformer to have significant leakage inductance, but a much smaller primary-secondary capacitance, which significantly reduces common-mode current injection through the bias transformer. The boost pre-regulator is designed to provide 7.5 W to the LLC converter, which can support a maximum of 6-W output.
Parameter | Specifications |
---|---|
Input voltage range | 6 V–28 V |
Output voltage and current | 4 × 18-V rails, 1 × 167 mA, 3 × 56 mA, 6 W maximum |
Switching frequency | Boost: 300 kHz, LLC: 1 MHz |
Isolation | Yes |
Topology | Open-loop LLC transformer driver with boost pre-regulator |
The efficiency of the boost converter and the open-loop LLC were measured separately. For the boost measurements the LLC was disabled by shorting the DIS/FLT pin of the UCC25800-Q1 (TP11) to GND and a resistive load was applied across the connector labeled VBOOST (J2). Efficiency curves were measured for inputs of 6 V, 12 V, 24 V, and 28 V.
The LLC measurements were taken with a regulated 30 V applied at the connector labeled VBOOST (J2) and with the boost input (J1) disconnected.
The efficiency and power dissipation data for the boost and LLC stages is shown in the following tables.
The following thermal image shows the board running with 6 VIN and 6 W being drawn from the 18-V LLC outputs (3 × 1 W and 1 × 3 W).
The loop stability of the boost converter is shown in the following plot. The plot was obtained with the LLC converter disabled and a resistive load applied across J2.
The voltage regulation of the LLC converter outputs is shown in the following figures.
The cross regulation was measured to showcase the effects of varying load on the other outputs of the LLC converter. The 3-W rail (Vo3W) and one of the 1-W rails (Vo1W3) were varied while the other 2 rails (Vo1W1 and Vo1W2) were held constant.
The switching behavior of both converters is shown in the following figures. As in previous sections, the two converters were evaluated separately.