The number of turns on the primary winding (NP) of the transformer is determined by two design considerations:
- The maximum flux density (BMAX) must be kept below the saturation limit (BSAT) of the chosen magnetic core under the highest peak magnetizing current (IM+(MAX)) condition, the cross-sectional area (AE) of the core, and highest core temperature. When IFB = 0 A, such as during VO soft-start or step-up load transient, the peak magnetizing current reaches IM+(MAX), since VCST = VCST(MAX) in those conditions. IM+(MAX) can be estimated based on the output power triggering an OPP fault (PO(OPP)) with VCST = VCST(OPP1) at VBULK(MIN).
Equation 25. ![GUID-50CA4B75-4D7B-42CE-8928-C9A84F485F1C-low.gif](/ods/images/JAJSLC6/GUID-50CA4B75-4D7B-42CE-8928-C9A84F485F1C-low.gif)
Equation 26. ![GUID-78E8A2FD-4939-4FC5-AD26-0D3D4B8B7DD2-low.gif](/ods/images/JAJSLC6/GUID-78E8A2FD-4939-4FC5-AD26-0D3D4B8B7DD2-low.gif)
- The AC flux density (ΔB) affects the core loss of the transformer. For a transition-mode ZVS flyback, the core loss is usually highest at high line, since the switching frequency is highest, duty cycle is smallest, and peak-to-peak magnetizing current swing is greatest for a given load condition. The following equation is the ΔB calculation including the contribution of negative magnetizing current (IM-), used to put into the Steinmetz equation for more accurate core loss estimation. For VBULK ≥ NPS(VO+VF), IM- is calculated with VBULK divided by the characteristic impedance of LM and the lumped time-related switch-node capacitance (CSW). IM- is always a negative value. The expression of fSW is derived based on the triangular approximation of the magnetizing current, which also considers the effect of IM- over wide DC or AC input line conditions.
Equation 27. ![GUID-A4A0411D-C67D-4F73-ABBF-8CAE0B8CE330-low.gif](/ods/images/JAJSLC6/GUID-A4A0411D-C67D-4F73-ABBF-8CAE0B8CE330-low.gif)
Equation 28. ![GUID-CC8A2C3F-703F-46F5-B0BE-D0373AD79EDD-low.gif](/ods/images/JAJSLC6/GUID-CC8A2C3F-703F-46F5-B0BE-D0373AD79EDD-low.gif)
Equation 29. ![GUID-CDD8369E-471B-438B-A4ED-AA6624593963-low.gif](/ods/images/JAJSLC6/GUID-CDD8369E-471B-438B-A4ED-AA6624593963-low.gif)
Equation 30. ![GUID-7007B10F-B567-468C-AC1D-30CCA015B85F-low.gif](/ods/images/JAJSLC6/GUID-7007B10F-B567-468C-AC1D-30CCA015B85F-low.gif)
Equation 31. ![GUID-AC5D9FFD-5133-4A72-8F28-DF62C2C8E496-low.gif](/ods/images/JAJSLC6/GUID-AC5D9FFD-5133-4A72-8F28-DF62C2C8E496-low.gif)
Equation 32. ![GUID-EDB889DB-DA5A-4420-AE97-E0C9E638F958-low.gif](/ods/images/JAJSLC6/GUID-EDB889DB-DA5A-4420-AE97-E0C9E638F958-low.gif)
For the ΔB calculation, remember that IM- is a negative value and that ΔB is a peak-to-peak flux swing. Core loss is based on ½ of ΔB.