SLAAEH7 February   2024 MSPM0L1306

 

  1.   1
  2.   Abstract
  3.   Trademarks
  4. 1Introduction
    1. 1.1 System Description
    2. 1.2 Design 1: High Efficiency Design with 50kHz
    3. 1.3 Design 2: Space Optimized Design with 250kHz
    4. 1.4 Design 3: MCU Driven Design with Flexible Switching Frequency
      1. 1.4.1 Selection of MOSFETs
      2. 1.4.2 Efficiency Test
        1. 1.4.2.1 Current Consumption of PWM (Ipwm) Test
        2. 1.4.2.2 Efficiency Test Set Up
        3. 1.4.2.3 Efficiency Test Results at 50kHz Switching Frequency
        4. 1.4.2.4 Efficiency Test Results at 250kHz Switching Frequency
  5. 2Design File
    1. 2.1 Schematics
    2. 2.2 Bill of Materials
  6. 3Summary
  7. 4References

Selection of MOSFETs

To make sure the half-bridge circuit depicted in Figure 2-11 operate within safe limits, maintain efficiency, and contribute to the circuit's longevity, selecting the appropriate MOSFETs involves several considerations:

  1. Voltage Rating: The MOSFETs must have a drain-to-source voltage rating (V_DS) that exceeds the maximum input voltage (3.6V) of the circuit to handle voltage spikes without breaking down.
  2. R_DS (on) Value: A lower on-resistance (R_DS (on)) is preferred for reduced conduction losses, which improves efficiency and minimizes heat generation.
  3. Gate Charge: Lower gate charge (Qg) allows for faster switching and lower switching losses, which is critical for high switching frequency operation.

Besides the aforementioned characteristics, it is also crucial to factor in the threshold voltage (VGS_th), switching speed, and package. Aiming for a more compact design, a comparison of various MOSFETs with ultra-small footprints is conducted, as detailed in Table 1-2 for N-MOSFETs and Table 1-3 for P-MOSFETs.

Table 1-2 Comparison of Ultra-Small Footprint N-Channel FemtoFET™ MOSFETs
CSD13380F3 CSD13383F4 CSD13385F5 CSD15380F3 CSD17381F4
V_DS (V) 12 12 12 20 30

R_DS (on) (mΩ)

at VGS = 2.5V

73 53 18 2220 110
Qg (typ) (nC) 0.91 2.0 3.9 0.216 1.04
VGS_th (typ) (V) 0.85 1.0 0.8 1.1 0.85
Table 1-3 Comparison of Ultra-Small Footprint P-Channel FemtoFET™ MOSFETs
CSD23280F3 CSD23382F4 CSD23285F5 CSD25480F3 CSD25481F4
V_DS (V) –12 –12 –12 –20 –20

R_DS (on) (mΩ)

at VGS = -2.5 V

129 90 38 203 145
Qg (typ) (nC) 0.95 1.04 3.2 0.7 0.913
VGS_th (typ) (V) –0.65 –0.8 –0.65 –0.95 –0.95

After comparing the specifications in the tables, the CSD13380F3 for N-Channel and CSD23382F4 for P-Channel MOSFETs have been selected. This decision is based on their lower resistance when on (R_DS(on)) and the lower charge required to switch them on and off (Qg), which means they will use less power and switch faster. Additionally, both of them the threshold voltages (V_GS(th)) are very similar, which ensures a balanced switching and reduces the risk of short through during transitions, and overall leads to a more efficient circuit operation. These features make them well-suited for high-frequency, space-conscious applications.