SLYT853 May   2024 ADC12DJ5200RF

 

  1.   1
  2. 1Introduction
  3. 2AAF design approach
  4. 3AAF design process and parameters
  5. 4AAF design trade-offs
  6. 5AAF design example
  7. 6AAF design conclusion
  8. 7Additional resources

AAF design process and parameters

The basic AAF design process and guidelines are:

  1. Set the external ADC termination resistor (RTADC) appropriately. This helps the AAF realize a “real” impedance over its desired frequency response.
  2. Select RKB based on experience or the ADC data sheet recommendations; typically, this will be between 5Ω and 50Ω.
  3. Use Equation 1 to calculate the filter load impedance so that the aggregate parallel and series combination of RTADC, RKB and RADC is between 100Ω and 400Ω. See my recommendation in the previous section.
    Equation 1. ZAAFL - RTADC || (RADC + 2RKB)
  4. Select the amplifier external series resistor (RA). This is typically between 5Ω and 50Ω. RA helps dampen the amplifier output response and reduce unnecessary peaking in the pass band.
  5. Use the calculated ZAAFL so that the total load seen by the amplifier (ZAL) is optimal for the particular differential amplifier chosen. See Step No. 1 above in the AAF Design Approach Section and use Equation 2:
    Equation 2. ZAL = 2RA + ZAAFL

    Keep in mind that ZAL is the FDA’s characterized RL; therefore, using too high or too low a value can have an adverse effect on the amplifier’s linearity.

  6. Calculate the filter source resistance using Equation 3:
    Equation 3. ZAAFS = ZO + 2RA
  7. Using a filter design program, design the filter using the same source and load impedances, if possible, ZAAFS and ZAAFL. This helps reduce the amount of loss in the filter. Any mismatch between the input/output impedance has a loss of 10*log(input Z/output Z). For example, with an input impedance of 50Ω and an output impedance of 200Ω, the loss of the filter is –6.0dB or 10*log(50/200). Also, using a bandwidth that is about 10% more or higher than the desired bandwidth of the application will ensure that the intended bandwidth is covered per the application, and help overcome any second- and third-order parasitic losses unrealized during the filter implementation process.

    After running a few preliminary simulations, give the circuit a quick review for the following items:

  8. The value of CAAF2 & 3 should be sufficiently big relative to CADC, which minimizes the sensitivity of the filter to variations in CADC.
  9. The ratio of ZAAFL to ZAAFS should not be more than 6-to-7, so that the filter is within the limits of most filter tables and design programs. Ideally, they should be the same to minimize loss, but this is not usually possible.
  10. Try to use a value of CAAF2 in the few picofarads range to minimize sensitivity to parasitic capacitance and component variations.
  11. Inductors LAAF1 and LAAF2 should be reasonable values and in the nanohenries range.
  12. The value of CAFF2 and LAAF2 should be reasonable values; select these two parameters to optimize the filter’s center frequency. Sometimes circuit simulators can make these values too low or too high. To make these values more reasonable, simply ratio these values with better standard-value components that maintain the same resonant frequency.
  13. Use 0201 package styles if possible when designing in the gigahertz range to minimize second- and third-order parasitic effects that could disrupt the filter character shape or outline.

In some cases, the filter design program may provide more than one unique solution, especially with higher-order filters. Always choose the solution that uses the most reasonable set of component values. For filter configurations that end with a shunt capacitor, take the ADC’s internal input capacitance into consideration as well. You may need an iteration or two to set the filter pole and ultimate bandwidth correctly.