SPRACM9B June   2019  – November 2020 F29H850TU , F29H859TU-Q1 , TMS320F28384D , TMS320F28384S , TMS320F28386D , TMS320F28386S , TMS320F28388D , TMS320F28388S , TMS320F28P650DH , TMS320F28P650DK , TMS320F28P650SH , TMS320F28P650SK , TMS320F28P659DH-Q1 , TMS320F28P659DK-Q1 , TMS320F28P659SH-Q1

 

  1.   Trademarks
  2. 1 Introduction
    1. 1.1 Acronyms Used in This Document
  3. 2 Benefits of the TMS320F2838x MCU for High-Bandwidth Current Loop
  4. 3 Current Loops in Servo Drives
  5. 4 Outline of the Fast Current Loop Library
  6. 5 Fast Current Loop Evaluation
    1. 5.1 Evaluation Setup
      1. 5.1.1 Hardware
      2. 5.1.2 Software
      3. 5.1.3 FCL With T-Format Type Position Encoder
        1. 5.1.3.1 Connecting T-Format Encoder to IDDK
        2. 5.1.3.2 T-Format Interface Software
        3. 5.1.3.3 T-Format Encoder Latency Considerations
      4. 5.1.4 SDFM
      5. 5.1.5 Incremental System Build
  7. 6 Incremental Build Level 1
    1. 6.1 SVGEN Test
    2. 6.2 Testing SVGEN With DACs
    3. 6.3 Inverter Functionality Verification
  8. 7 Incremental Build Level 2
    1. 7.1 Setting the Overcurrent Limit in the Software
    2. 7.2 Current Sense Method
    3. 7.3 Voltage Sense Method
    4. 7.4 Setting Current Regulator Limits
    5. 7.5 Verification of Current Sense
    6. 7.6 Position Encoder Feedback
      1. 7.6.1 Speed Observer and Position Estimator
      2. 7.6.2 Verification of Position Encoder Orientation
  9. 8 Incremental Build Level 3
    1. 8.1 Observation One – PWM Update Latency
      1. 8.1.1 From the Expressions Window
      2. 8.1.2 From the Scope Plot
  10. 9 Incremental Build Level 4
    1. 9.1 Observation
  11. 10Incremental Build Level 5
  12. 11Incremental Build Level 6
    1. 11.1 Integrating SFRA Library
    2. 11.2 Initial Setup Before Starting SFRA
    3. 11.3 SFRA GUIs
    4. 11.4 Setting Up the GUIs to Connect to Target Platform
    5. 11.5 Running the SFRA GUIs
    6. 11.6 Influence of Current Feedback SNR
    7. 11.7 Inferences
      1. 11.7.1 Bandwidth Determination From Closed Loop Plot
      2. 11.7.2 Phase Margin Determination From Open Loop Plot
      3. 11.7.3 Maximum Modulation Index Determination From PWM Update Time
      4. 11.7.4 Voltage Decoupling in Current Loop
    8. 11.8 Phase Margin vs Gain Crossover Frequency
  13. 12Incremental Build Level 7
    1. 12.1 Run the Code on CPU1 to Allocate ECAT to CM
    2. 12.2 Run the Code on CM to Setup ECAT
    3. 12.3 Setup TwinCAT
    4. 12.4 Scanning for EtherCAT Devices via TwinCAT
    5. 12.5 Program ControlCard EEPROM for ESC
    6. 12.6 Running the Application
  14. 13Incremental Build Level 8
    1. 13.1 Run the Code on CPU1 to Allocate ECAT to CM
    2. 13.2 Run the Code on CM to Setup ECAT
    3. 13.3 Running the Application
  15. 14References
  16. 15Revision History

11.7.3 Maximum Modulation Index Determination From PWM Update Time

From Section 8.1, the time lapse between feedback sampling to PWM update is about 0.9µs. In this system where the PWM frequency is 10 KHz, the maximum modulation index is limited by the sampling method as follows

  • Double sampling - just above 96%
  • Single sampling - just about 98%

This is quite comparable to FPGA based systems where the entire algorithm is implemented in hardware.