SPRUHJ1I January 2013 – October 2021 TMS320F2802-Q1 , TMS320F28026-Q1 , TMS320F28026F , TMS320F28027-Q1 , TMS320F28027F , TMS320F28027F-Q1 , TMS320F28052-Q1 , TMS320F28052F , TMS320F28052F-Q1 , TMS320F28052M , TMS320F28052M-Q1 , TMS320F28054-Q1 , TMS320F28054F , TMS320F28054F-Q1 , TMS320F28054M , TMS320F28054M-Q1 , TMS320F2806-Q1 , TMS320F28062-Q1 , TMS320F28062F , TMS320F28062F-Q1 , TMS320F28068F , TMS320F28068M , TMS320F28069-Q1 , TMS320F28069F , TMS320F28069F-Q1 , TMS320F28069M , TMS320F28069M-Q1
If the approximate linear model of the system is achieved, the performance can be evaluated in frequency domain. The purpose of this section is to visually illustrate the SpinTAC Velocity Control and SpinTAC Position Control performance in engineering language (Bode analysis) not to ask users to do the analysis of a given system.
The SpinTAC Velocity Control is designed to optimize disturbance rejection performance and trajectory tracking performance together and tune the control with one single parameter: the bandwidth. The typical reference tracking performance Bode and disturbance rejection performance Bode are illustrated in Figure 13-4.
As shown in Figure 13-4, the magnitude of Error/Reference Bode and Input Disturbance Sensitivity Bode are negative values with the unit dB. The more negative values on the magnitude curves, the better the system performance.
The performance analysis of SpinTAC Position Control is similar to SpinTAC Velocity Control. The typical performance Bodes are shown in Figure 13-5.