SSZT393 october   2019 TPS92520-Q1

 

  1.   1
  2.   2
    1.     3
    2.     Constant on-time control vs. hysteretic control – pseudo-fixed-frequency operation
    3.     Modern ECU requirements
    4.     The power-density advantage of the TPS92520-Q1
    5.     Additional resources

Issac Hsu

Advanced automotive headlights require dynamic lighting functionality to achieve road-safety-enhancing features like adaptive driving beam and adaptive front lighting systems. These features use LED matrix managers (LMMs) to perform dynamic brightness changes on individual LED pixels. The LED current of a headlight with normal brightness ranges from 350 mA to above 1 A. For such kind of current level, the board size built with traditional devices tend to be big. The trend of headlight is moving for more channels of dynamic lighting functions, there is a need to have a high-power-density DC/DC buck LED driver that supports dynamic load operations for further miniaturization of headlight driver systems.

Let’s review the electronic control unit (ECU) requirements for dynamic headlights implemented with LMMs. Because the LED stack or total string voltage changes dynamically with different road environments, it’s best if the current-providing LED drivers use the smallest possible capacitors. From [1], a boost-into-hysteretic buck architecture is the most optimal choice for ECUs. A buck converter provides a continuous output current to the LED in order to minimize the output capacitances, as shown in Figure 1.

GUID-74D11D4A-3FD5-41D1-B878-AB2F3D49D543-low.jpg Figure 1 Output current of a buck LED driver

A hysteretic control method best supports the dynamic brightness changes of LEDs, as shown in Figure 2.

GUID-5938774F-FADA-48DB-8D96-2255CCDB05E3-low.png Figure 2 Hysteretic operation of a DC/DC LED driver

The nature of hysteretic operation is that the switching frequency will change according to the ratio of the output voltage and input voltage, as shown in Figure 3 and Figure 4, respectively.

GUID-79B2F8F9-CA4B-43BB-A0F4-925DBE5D1525-low.jpg Figure 3 Switching frequency vs. output voltage with a fixed input voltage (hysteretic operation)
GUID-E7C3C0D5-46D7-4615-92B5-4D9402D6FFDE-low.jpg Figure 4 Switching frequency vs. input voltage with a fixed output voltage (hysteretic operation)

Constant on-time control vs. hysteretic control – pseudo-fixed-frequency operation

For a hysteretic-controlled buck LED driver, the switching frequency changes according to the relationship between the input voltage and the output voltage. A changing switching frequency is sometimes not desirable, especially when trying to minimize electromagnetic interference (EMI). Most designs require a fixed switching frequency so that passive components can tackle the EMI generated around that switching frequency.

Constant on-time control is a hysteretic-based control scheme that provides pseudo-fixed-frequency operation. The duty cycle of the switching frequency is the ratio of the output voltage to the input voltage. If you can control the on time of the switching metal-oxide semiconductor field-effect transistor (MOSFET) such that it is proportional to the ratio of the output voltage to input voltage, then in theory, the switching frequency of the LED driver would stay the same.

Figure 5 and Figure 6 are conceptual block diagrams of a constant on-time-controlled LED driver and the inductor current waveform.

GUID-30FC1761-59E3-4BB5-A446-16102CCFA642-low.jpg Figure 5 Conceptual block diagram of a constant on-time-controlled buck LED driver
GUID-AD562CF5-8122-4EBC-8BC1-AC7EBC49B5E0-low.jpg Figure 6 Inductor current ripple at different VIN-VOUT ratios

Since the on time is controlled according to the VIN and VOUT ratio, the duty cycle changes with a defined valley current limit. Therefore, the switching frequency is kept nearly constant, as shown in Figure 6.

Modern ECU requirements

A typical headlight ECU has an average of six to eight channels of output for different light uses: high beam, low beam, daytime running lights, position lights, turn indicators, fog lamps and so on. Figure 7 is a typical block diagram of an ECU. The total output power for such an ECU ranges from 60 W to 120 W. These specifications necessitate a small-sized yet efficient ECU solution – one that can fit in a tight spot within the car body without generating too much heat.

GUID-3E8F7556-2458-4B4E-8D72-A1FBBACF40BD-low.jpg Figure 7 Typical ECU block diagram

The power-density advantage of the TPS92520-Q1

The TPS92520-Q1 monolithic synchronous dual-channel constant on-time DC/DC buck LED driver helps reduce ECU solution size and provides high power-conversion efficiency. It has a programmable switching frequency with up to 2.2-MHz operation. It accepts Serial Peripheral Interface commands from a microcontroller, thus minimizing the number of passive components around the device for parametric setup.

Integrating all four N-channel MOSFETs in the device not only saves space, but also improves power-conversion efficiency because MOSFETs provide a lower turn-on drain-to-source resistance (RDSON). More importantly, the device operates at above 1.8 MHz and reduces the physical size of the inductors. With two buck channels in one package, the number of devices to implement the ECU is half the number of channels; for example, three devices for six channels and four devices for eight channels.

In conclusion, a modern headlight ECU which supports dynamic lighting function requires buck LED drivers. With more and more channels having dynamic lighting functions, high-power-density LED drivers are required. High-power-density LED drivers (such as TPS92520-Q1) help implementing small-size, high performance headlight ECUs.