SLYA042 July 2024 FDC1004 , FDC1004-Q1
The input resistors chosen for the input pins (REXT1 at IN+ and REXT2 at IN-) were 110Ω resistors along with a differential 1nF input capacitor (CDIFF). For the references pins, an approximate 150mV reference voltage was generated with a 49.9kΩ (Ra) and 1.5kΩ (Rb) resistor divider off the VS pin as shown in Table 9-1.
Name (EVM Designator) | Value | Tolerance | Drift | Package |
---|---|---|---|---|
CDIFF (C5D) | 1nF | 1% | C0G, NP0 | 0603 |
REXT1 (R2D), REXT2 (R4D) | 110Ω | 1% | 50ppm/°C | 0603 |
Ra (R5D) | 49.9kΩ | 1% | 50ppm/°C | 0603 |
Rb (R6D) | 1.5kΩ | 1% | 50ppm/°C | 0603 |
Errors generated from input resistance and reference resistance were distinguished from each other by measuring differential output along with monitoring reference voltage simultaneously.
Input-Output sweeps were run on the EVM at -40°C, 25°C, and 125°C ambient temperatures first with REXT = 0Ω and then with REXT = 110Ω. VOUT was monitored to remain with device's linear output operating region. Linear output region for INA185 is defined at 0.75V < VOUT<4.9V. Additionally, at 125°C, the VCM was swept to measure common-mode rejection (CMR).
Data analysis begins by calculating the total shunt voltage gain using a best-fit line method on all of the VOUT, Differential and the VDIFF values within the designated linear output region. For each VDIFF, an input offset is calculated using linear interpolation with the calculated gain. The final VOS chosen for analysis is the average of all individual offsets pertaining to designated linear output region.
Exact external input resistance errors (EG, EXT, VOS, EXT, EG DRIFT, EXT, VOS Drift, EXT, and CMRREXT) quantified by simply calculating the error difference with and without input resistances.
The loading error to the REF pin (eREF, EXT) is also considered. The measured reference pin (VREF_EFFECTIVE) is compared against a theoretical value using Equation 21 from related Driving Voltage Reference Pins of Current-Sensing Amplifiers, application note. Review this note for more understanding on how these equations were derived.
Errors are compared against a predicted model that uses equations found in Section 6.