SNOAA61A October   2020  – February 2021 LMG3422R030 , LMG3422R050 , LMG3425R030 , LMG3425R050

 

  1.   Trademarks
  2. 1Introduction
  3. 2New QFN 12x12 Package
  4. 3Bottom-Side Cooling Configuration and Definition of RθJC/P
    1. 3.1 Definition of RθJC/P for Package Thermal Performance
    2. 3.2 Design Recommendations for Bottom-Side Cooling System
  5. 4Simulation Models and Results
    1. 4.1 Finite Element Models for Thermal Analysis
    2. 4.2 Thermal Simulation Results
  6. 5Experimental Setup and RθJC/P Testing Results
  7. 6Thermal Performance of QFN 12x12 Package on Half-Bridge Evaluation Board
  8. 7Summary
  9. 8References
  10. 9Revision History

Finite Element Models for Thermal Analysis

Simulation models were built using ANSYS finite element analysis (FEA) software in order to compare thermal performance (i.e., RθJC/P) of different surface-mount packages. Illustrations of four models including QFN 8x8, QFN 12x12, TOLL, and D2PAK packages are shown in Figure 4-1. The former two QFN packages are implemented for TI’s 600-V GaN power stage products while the latter two are used by competitors for their commercially released 600-V GaN and 650-V SiC discrete devices respectively. Each surface-mount device is placed on the center of a 4-layer PCB in 40-mm x 40-mm surface area and 1.58-mm thickness.

GUID-20201007-CA0I-JZRX-BWBM-8FSK9WTNTHVN-low.png Figure 4-1 Simulation Models Built for Different Packages: (a) QFN 8x8, (b) QFN 12x12, (c) TOLL, and (d) D2PAK

An example cross-sectional view of the generated model with a detailed description on the multilayer PCB structure is displayed in Figure 4-2. Most building elements including thermal via patten design (Figure 4-3) are the same for all built models except two items: PCB top Cu layer design and total numbers of thermal vias, which were adjusted to fit for the thermal pad area of each package for the purpose of a fair thermal performance comparison among different packages. Please note that the top Cu pad for heat spreading and the corresponding thermal via pattern/number can be further optimized for specific applications. Table 4-1 summarizes the key dimensional and thermal information for major modelling components.

GUID-20201007-CA0I-6RT1-CZCH-WPG6LHRSW1MJ-low.png Figure 4-2 Cross-Section View of Simulation Model (QFN 8x8)
GUID-20201007-CA0I-50LV-9JTZ-NSWC9HW832VN-low.png Figure 4-3 Thermal Via Pattern on PCB
Table 4-1 Properties of Simulation Model Components
COMPONENT THICKNESS (mm) MATERIAL THERMAL CONDUCTIVITY (W/mK)
Solder 0.05 Lead-free solder 50
PCB 0.12 (prepreg)/1.06 (core) FR4 0.3
0.07 (4 layers) Cu 385
Thermal Via 0.025 Cu plating 385
0.2 (diameter) Epoxy via filling 1
TIM 1 Gap filler pad 8
Coldplate 2.5 Aluminum alloy 160