SBAA607A December 2023 – January 2024 AM2631 , AM2631-Q1 , AM2632 , AM2632-Q1 , AM2634 , AM2634-Q1 , AM263P4 , AM263P4-Q1 , AMC1303M2520 , AMC1305L25 , AMC1306M25 , F29H850TU , F29H859TU-Q1 , TMS320F280033 , TMS320F280034 , TMS320F280034-Q1 , TMS320F280036-Q1 , TMS320F280036C-Q1 , TMS320F280037 , TMS320F280037-Q1 , TMS320F280037C , TMS320F280037C-Q1 , TMS320F280038-Q1 , TMS320F280038C-Q1 , TMS320F280039 , TMS320F280039-Q1 , TMS320F280039C , TMS320F280039C-Q1 , TMS320F280040-Q1 , TMS320F280040C-Q1 , TMS320F280041 , TMS320F280041-Q1 , TMS320F280041C , TMS320F280041C-Q1 , TMS320F280045 , TMS320F280048-Q1 , TMS320F280048C-Q1 , TMS320F280049 , TMS320F280049-Q1 , TMS320F280049C , TMS320F280049C-Q1 , TMS320F28075 , TMS320F28075-Q1 , TMS320F28076 , TMS320F28374D , TMS320F28374S , TMS320F28375D , TMS320F28375S , TMS320F28375S-Q1 , TMS320F28376D , TMS320F28376S , TMS320F28377D , TMS320F28377D-Q1 , TMS320F28377S , TMS320F28377S-Q1 , TMS320F28378D , TMS320F28378S , TMS320F28379D , TMS320F28379D-Q1 , TMS320F28379S , TMS320F28384D , TMS320F28384D-Q1 , TMS320F28384S , TMS320F28384S-Q1 , TMS320F28386D , TMS320F28386D-Q1 , TMS320F28386S , TMS320F28386S-Q1 , TMS320F28388D , TMS320F28388S , TMS320F28P650DH , TMS320F28P650DK , TMS320F28P650SH , TMS320F28P650SK , TMS320F28P659DH-Q1 , TMS320F28P659DK-Q1 , TMS320F28P659SH-Q1
Clock edge delay compensation helps to meet setup and hold time requirements with isolated Delta-Sigma modulators and the MCUs digital interface without the necessity of reducing the modulator clock frequency. This allows the system to operate at full performance.
The clock edge delay compensation can be implemented by various methods these are compensation by:
Compensation methods such as additional clock signal with software configurable phase delay and clock inversion at MCU were analyzed in more detail for the most common used isolated Delta-Sigma modulator variants and validated with AMC1306EVM evaluation module and C2000 TMS320F28379D Launchpad as well as Sitara AM243x Launchpad chosen as MCUs. The test results hold true for MCUs with CMOS interface and SDFM as well as for Sitara MCUs with no SDFM when working with PRU.
Table 5-1 shows the benefits and drawbacks of each clock signal compensation method. In the following the abbreviations SW Phase Delay and HW Phase Delay are used for compensation with software configurable phase delay and hardware configurable phase delay.
Method | Benefits | Drawbacks |
---|---|---|
SW Phase delay |
|
|
HW Phase delay |
|
|
Clock Return |
|
|
Clock Inversion |
|
|
Depending on the type of the Delta-Sigma Modulator, differentiated by external or internal clock source and CMOS or LVDS interface, different clock signal compensation methods can be better than others. Table 5-2 compares the suggested compensation methods for each type of Delta-Sigma modulator which are commonly used.
Method |
AMC1306M25 external clock (CMOS) |
AMC1305L25 external clock (LVDS) |
AMC1303M2520/10 internal clock (CMOS) |
---|---|---|---|
Software Phase Delay | + | + | N/A |
Hardware Phase Delay | o | o | o |
Clock Return | o | - | N/A |
Clock Inversion | o | o | + |
For modulators which require an external clock, the clock signal compensation with software configurable phase delay offers the best performance, followed by the clock inversion at the MCU, if a fixed one-half of clock cycle meets the requirements. Both of these clock signal compensation methods help to meet the setup and hold timing requirements of the MCU especially at higher modulator clock frequencies. The following calculation tool can be used to validate the setup and hold timing requirements of the MCU when using the Delta-Sigma modulator AMC1306M25 and AMC1305L25.