SLYY229A February 2024 – March 2024 DRV5055-Q1 , LDC5072-Q1 , TMAG3001 , TMAG5110-Q1 , TMAG5111 , TMAG5115 , TMAG5170-Q1 , TMAG5170D-Q1 , TMAG5173-Q1 , TMAG5231 , TMAG5253 , TMAG5273 , TMAG6180-Q1 , TMAG6181-Q1
While developing industrial, personal electronics and automotive systems, designers are concurrently thinking of how to make their designs more reliable in order to increase their product’s life span. A rather recent trend for position sensing involves a couple of different methods to achieve this goal – moving from mechanical systems to magnetic sensors and the acceleration of functional safety compliance.
Magnetic sensors eliminate constant mechanical wear and tear caused by friction. In cordless power tools, for example, the mechanical trigger design is the most prevalent failure mode, and manufacturers typically have a target of >200,000 cycles over the life of the product. The lifetime cycle targets vary by end product, but the expectation is that a magnetic-based solution has the potential to extend product life. Table 1 summarizes a few of these examples.
Application | Existing technology | Benefit of using a position sensor over a mechanical sensor | Recommended technologies |
---|---|---|---|
Triggers for cordless power tools and medical power drills | Mechanical potentiometer designs |
|
Hall effect and inductive |
Refrigerator door open-and-close detection | Microswitches |
|
Hall effect |
Gaming controllers and keyboards | Mechanical designs |
|
Hall effect and inductive |
Steering systems: steering stalk shifters, steering columns, knobs and e-shifters |
Mechanical designs |
|
Hall effect, inductive and AMR |
Braking systems | Mechanical hydraulic designs |
|
Hall effect and inductive |
The advent of vehicle electrification and the addition of more electronics into almost every electrically powered product has accelerated the need for functional safety. The automotive industry follows International Organization for Standardization 26262 for automotive products, while the industrial sector follows International Electrotechnical Commission 61508. Functional safety aims to protect users by eliminating unreasonable risk caused by the malfunctioning of electronic systems. If the system fails, it should default to a predictable and known state.
There are several categories of automotive and industrial functional safety standards based on severity or consequence (how much injury could occur), exposure or likelihood (how likely it is), and controllability (how much control does the user have). A couple of examples in automotive systems that require the highest functional safety rating are EPS or shifter systems (e-shifters). Both systems often require the highest automotive rating (ASIL D) given the risks associated with their failure.
To comply with ASIL D requirements, system developers typically use redundant sensors or solutions that have two identical but independent sensors that are internally isolated from each other. There is a very low probability that both sensors will fail. These types of high-performance systems also need high-accuracy angle detection. The TMAG5170-Q1 3D sensor and its dual-die equivalent, the TMAG5170D-Q1, have built-in diagnostics features for both device and system levels.