SSZT546 february 2019 ISO6721 , ISO7041 , ISO7721 , ISO7741 , ISOS141-SEP , ISOW7841 , SN6501
This article was updated on October 9, 2020.
Looking for more information about digital isolators? We’re here to help. Based on TI E2E™ Community feedback, we compiled a list of the most frequently asked questions about digital isolator design challenges. We hope this list will provide useful insights when isolating signals and power.
Basic digital isolators have to pass a suite of tests according to component-level standards such as Deutsches Institut für Normung (DIN) V Verband der Elektrotechnik, Elektronik und Informationstechnik (VDE) V 0884-11. DIN V VDE V 0884-11 defines the voltage levels that the isolator can withstand, such as the maximum surge isolation voltage, VIOSM; the maximum transient isolation voltage, VOITM; and maximum repetitive peak isolation voltage, VIORM (as explained in the white paper, “High-voltage reinforced isolation: Definitions and test methodologies”). Reinforced digital isolators, in addition to passing these tests, have to pass a minimum surge voltage test level of 10,000 VPK.
The first step is to understand the isolation specification requirements for your system. While requirements can sometimes feel like an open-ended list, there are some key aspects to consider related to common isolation design to help you get started.
Once you have narrowed down your digital isolator specification requirements, the next step is to consider different package options.
Packages can make a big difference when it comes to isolation since the size and characteristics of the package have direct effects on the high-voltage capabilities of a device. Some of the same high-voltage requirements discussed above (creepage, clearance, working voltage, surge voltage, isolation withstand voltage) can come into play when selecting the right package. A larger package with wider creepage and clearance will allow for higher isolation voltage specifications.
If your system’s regulatory requirements can be met with a smaller package option, you can consider this option to help save both board space and cost. Additionally, you will want to consider how many channels of isolation your communication interface will require since higher channels counts will dictate which package type can be used.
After specifications, requirements and packaging, it’s also important to consider how many channels you need for signals and which direction each signal is being sent. This will help determine the channel count and channel configuration you need. Next, consider the default output state (or fail-safe state) you prefer for your design. This determines what predefined state, either high or low, an output pin takes when the input channel of a digital isolator is unpowered or the pins left floating.
Once you have your key requirements in mind, Figure 1 is a simple digital isolator selection flowchart that can help you determine the right device for your design.
Use this list to learn more about the devices in the TI digital isolator selection flowchart:
Yes. Digital isolators can be supplied voltages within the recommended operating conditions on both sides of the device. Since an isolation barrier separates the two sides, each side can be sourced independently with any voltage within recommended operating conditions. For example, it’s possible to supply ISO6721 VCC1 with 3.3 V (which is within 2.25 V to 5.5 V) and VCC2 with 5 V (which is also within 2.25 V to 5.5 V). This way, you can use the digital isolator as a logic-level translator in addition to providing isolation. The two sides of the isolator are independent.
No. The input/output signal voltages of digital isolators depend on its applied power-supply voltage. Hence, for the digital isolator to be compatible with the devices it interfaces to, it’s best to keep signal voltages similar to the isolator power-supply voltage. For example, when the ISO6721 is powered with 5 V and interfaces to a microcontroller (MCU), it is important that the MCU signals are also operating at 5-V logic levels.
When the input channel of a digital isolator is unpowered or the pins left floating, its respective output pin takes a predefined state (called the default state or fail-safe state), which can be either low or high depending on the device chosen. The suffix “F” in a device part number indicates the default state of output channels of the isolator. For example, no F in the ISO7721DWR indicates that the default state for this device is high. Similarly, the F in the ISO7721FDWR indicates that the default state for this device is low.
No. Input pins of unused channels of a digital isolator can be left floating for testing purposes, but in applications, leaving the unused pins floating could make the product less immune to noise.
The floating pins are especially prone to noise pickup when the system is subjected to electromagnetic compatibility (EMC)/immunity tests. To make the system immune to such noise, it is best to tie the channel inputs to their respective default logic states.
For example, for the ISO7721DWR, it is best to connect the unused signal input pin to its VCC through a pull-up resistor (preferably with a 4.7-kΩ resistance). For the TI ISO7721FDWR, it’s best to connect the unused signal input pin to its GND pin and leave. For both devices, the output pins of all unused channels are best left unconnected.
You can calculate the power consumption of a digital isolator from specifications listed in their data sheet. Locate the Supply Current Characteristics table for your corresponding supply voltage (2.5 V, 3.3 V, 5 V). Within this table, find the data rate closest to the speed of your application signals. The data sheet will list the current consumption for that particular data rate, as a separate total for each side of the isolation barrier (ICC1 and ICC2). Adding these two currents together gives you the total current consumption of the device under that operating condition. Dividing it by the channel count of the digital isolator gives you the per-channel current consumption. Some data sheets also provide this total supply current per channel separately. For example, the ISO7041 data sheet shows a typical current consumption of 4.2 µA under the Total Supply Current Per Channel parameter, which is the ICC1(ch) plus ICC2(ch) currents.
There are several options to generate isolated power for a digital isolator; the best solution depends on the specific application needs.
One option is to use a transformer driver like TI’s SN6501, which operates in a push-pull configuration with a transformer and optional rectifying low-dropout regulator on the secondary side (Figure 2). The SN6501 is capable of delivering as much as 1.5 W to provide isolated power. This device has the flexibility for use in almost all applications because the transformer and turns ratio can provide the necessary isolation rating and output voltage for the power supply. You can use the SN6505 instead of the SN6501 for as much as 5 W of output power if you need isolated power for additional devices. The SN6505 has extra protection features such as overload and short circuit, thermal shutdown, soft start, and slew-rate control, enabling a robust solution.
Another option for space-constrained applications is the ISOW78xx family of devices, including the ISOW7841, which provides signal and power isolation in a 16-pin small-outline integrated circuit package. This combination, as featured in Figure 3, is compact, doesn’t require a transformer and makes certifications easy.
If you’re looking for more information about digital isolators or have a question you would like to see added to this list, leave a comment below and help us keep the conversation going.