All trademarks are the property of their respective owners.
With the never-ending trend of faster data rates, smaller form factors, and increased power density, board space is becoming gradually scarcer. This makes the job of the power-supply designer increasingly difficult as trying to fulfill all the design requirements, while keeping solution size to a minimum, is no small feat.
One way to go about minimizing the footprint that the power supply leaves on the total design is to choose a converter with a high switching frequency. With higher switching frequencies, design requirements such as output current ripple, output voltage ripple, and load transient can be achieved by using less inductance and output capacitance. This reduces solution size and decreases the total BOM cost of the power supply.
One of the disadvantages of going for higher switching frequencies is increased switching losses. The increased switching losses do not always correlate to decreased efficiency throughout the output current range. It should not be overlooked that switching losses are only one part of the total losses that occur during the operation of a buck converter. As a matter of fact, at higher currents, the conduction losses become the dominant contributor of power loss.
TI’s TPS628512 is a high frequency synchronous buck converter with a small 1.6-mm x 2.1-mm package which provides a small solution size optimized for space constrained applications. Later on in this application note, the TPS628512 will be compared with the TPS54218 to show the impact of conduction losses, in particular, conduction losses in the inductor, on the final efficiency.
There are three main sources of power loss in synchronous buck converters: quiescent losses (static losses), switching losses and conduction losses. In today’s buck converters the quiescent losses generally represent only a small percentage of the total losses when the load at the output of the converter is above a few tens of milliamps. This application note looks at relatively higher currents, in which case, the switching and conduction losses play a much bigger factor than the quiescent losses – which can be neglected.
The following two sections will briefly go through the causes of switching losses and conduction losses in synchronous buck converters.
Switching losses in synchronous buck converters are the result of charging and discharging the gate to drain and gate to source capacitances of the power MOSFETs when they are turned on and off. These losses can be calculated with the following equations:
Where:
One part of the conduction losses (Joule losses) in a buck converter are due to the drain-source on-state resistance of the power MOSFETs:
and the other part is due to the DCR of the inductor:
Where:
What is important to notice from these equations is that the conduction losses are dependent on the square of the RMS value of the current flowing through the particular MOSFET and through the inductor. And unlike the switching losses they are independent of switching frequency, as long as the inductor current ripple is held constant.
Figure 2-2 shows a calculated example efficiency curve of a synchronous buck converter plotted on the left y-axis along with the corresponding switching and conduction losses plotted on the right y-axis with respect to output current. This figure clearly displays how, due to the dependency on the square of the output current, at a certain point the conduction losses become the dominating factor and at higher currents their effect on efficiency is much more significant than that of the switching losses. In general, the switching losses and conduction losses are equal near the peak of the efficiency curve.