DLPA083B june   2019  – april 2023 DLP2000 , DLP2010 , DLP230KP , DLP230NP , DLP3010 , DLP3310 , DLP4620S-Q1 , DLP4710 , DLP471TP , DLP500YX , DLP5500 , DLP5530S-Q1 , DLP5531-Q1 , DLP5533A-Q1 , DLP6500FLQ , DLP6500FYE , DLP650LNIR , DLP670S , DLP7000 , DLP7000UV , DLP9000 , DLP9000X , DLP9000XUV , DLP9500 , DLP9500UV

 

  1.   Abstract
  2.   Trademarks
  3. 1Purpose and Scope
    1. 1.1 Limitations
    2. 1.2 Acronyms Used in This Document
  4. 2On-State Fill Factor
  5. 3Window Properties
  6. 4Mirror Diffraction Efficiency
    1. 4.1 Mirror Flatness
    2. 4.2 Mirror Diffraction Efficiency
    3. 4.3 Diffraction Efficiency with Mismatched Illumination and Projection f-numbers
  7. 5Mirror Reflectivity
  8. 6Estimating Overall DMD Efficiency
  9. 7References
  10. 8Revision History

Diffraction Efficiency with Mismatched Illumination and Projection f-numbers

The mismatched f-number approach is a method to improve diffraction efficiency performance. By utilizing a slower illumination f-number (larger f-number) and faster projection f-number (smaller f-number), the diffraction efficiency increases because more of the diffracted light from the reflected illumination beam is collected into the projection lens aperture. An example case is a system with the 7.56 μm pitch DMD, f/3 illumination and f/2.4 projection optics as shown in Figure 4-8. The matched f/2.4 illumination and f/2.4 projection case has an average diffraction efficiency of 83.9% while the mismatched f/3 illumination and f/2.4 projection case has an average diffraction efficiency of 90.5%. This method works across DMD devices. The margin of improvement depends largely on the selected f-numbers and DMD mirror size being used.

GUID-20230224-SS0I-QD80-0XTS-NLPJJB8WGQNJ-low.svg Figure 4-8 7.56 μm Pitch DMD Mirror Calculated Diffraction Efficiency With Matched and Mismatched f-numbers

A direct laser system, where larger illumination f-numbers (smaller illumination system etendue) does not significantly lower the projector luminous output, benefits from the mismatched f-number technique. In a slower f-number system with matched illumination and projection f-number, the local minima for a given diffraction efficiency curve is lower as compared to a faster, matched f-number system. This reduced diffraction efficiency can be greatly improved by utilizing the mismatched f-number technique, driving the diffraction efficiency much higher than a matched f-number system would provide. The mismatching of f-number in this way flattens or reduce the peak to valley difference in the diffraction efficiency curves.

The mismatched f-number technique trades off some system contrast for diffraction efficiency. The system contrast lies between the lower matched f-number and the higher matched f-number of those of the projection and illumination path. For example, for a mismatched f-number system in which the illumination is f/3 and projection is f/2.4, the contrast is higher than a f/2.4 matched projection system and lower than a f/3 matched projection system built around the same DMD.