SLUAAY2 December   2024 ISO5451 , ISO5451-Q1 , ISO5452 , ISO5452-Q1 , ISO5851 , ISO5851-Q1 , ISO5852S , ISO5852S-EP , ISO5852S-Q1 , UCC21710 , UCC21710-Q1 , UCC21717-Q1 , UCC21732 , UCC21732-Q1 , UCC21736-Q1 , UCC21737-Q1 , UCC21738-Q1 , UCC21739-Q1 , UCC21750 , UCC21750-Q1 , UCC21755-Q1 , UCC21756-Q1 , UCC21759-Q1

 

  1.   1
  2.   Abstract
  3.   Trademarks
  4. 1 Introduction
  5. 2 SiC and IGBT Characteristics
  6. 3 Failure Modes
  7. 4 Short-Circuit Protection Approaches
    1. 4.1 Short-Circuit Current-Based Protection Implementation
    2. 4.2 Short Circuit Voltage-Based Protection Implementation
  8. 5 DESAT Circuitry Design
    1. 5.1 DESAT Circuit Component Selection
    2. 5.2 Effect of Parasitic Elements
    3. 5.3 Effect of Rlim on DESAT Noise
  9. 6 Safe Shutdown
    1. 6.1 Safe Shutdown Mechanisms
    2. 6.2 Safe Shutdown Considerations
  10. 7 Short-Circuit Test Setup and Data
    1. 7.1 Short-Circuit Bench Measurement Setup
    2. 7.2 SC Board Setup for Data Collection
    3. 7.3 Different Circuit Configurations for SC Testing
    4. 7.4 Bench Measurement Results
    5. 7.5 Overall Summary of SiC vs IGBT Power Module SC Observation
  11. 8 Key Consideration in Designing SC Protection Circuit
  12. 9 Summary
  13. 10References

7.5 Overall Summary of SiC vs IGBT Power Module SC Observation

SiC IGBT
SC current increases ~66ns after gate on
(As SiC has lower gate threshold and lower gate capacitance)		 SC current increases ~350ns after gate on
(As IGBT has higher gate threshold and higher gate capacitance)
Peak current 6.87kA (at ~1.5μs delay) Peak current 2.565kA (at ~1.7μs delay)
Ideal to detect + initiate gate turn-off within < 1μs Ideal to detect + initiate gate turn-off within < 2μs
Faster turn off is needed, however balance between overshoot and turn off time

As IGBT can withstand SC current little longer, prioritize in reducing the overshoot