SLUAAY2 December 2024 ISO5451 , ISO5451-Q1 , ISO5452 , ISO5452-Q1 , ISO5851 , ISO5851-Q1 , ISO5852S , ISO5852S-EP , ISO5852S-Q1 , UCC21710 , UCC21710-Q1 , UCC21717-Q1 , UCC21732 , UCC21732-Q1 , UCC21736-Q1 , UCC21737-Q1 , UCC21738-Q1 , UCC21739-Q1 , UCC21750 , UCC21750-Q1 , UCC21755-Q1 , UCC21756-Q1 , UCC21759-Q1
There are four different SC tests conducted with different detection approaches. 9V DESAT threshold gate driver UCC21750-Q1 is used to capture SC data for both without external charge current and with external charge current. Also, 0.7V OC threshold gate drivers UCC21710-Q1 and UCC21732-Q1 are used to capture SC data for STO and 2LTO, different turn-off approaches.
As shown in Figure 7-7, with a default charge current of 0.5mA, the detection time, peak SC current, shutdown energy, and shutdown time are all high compared to external charge circuitry to enable faster detection.
As shown in Figure 7-8, the “OC as DESAT” peak current and detection time (Case3 and 4) are comparable to the “DESAT” detection time with external charge current (Case2).
In case of shutdown energy, 400mA STO performance Case3 matched Case2, however, 2LTO performance of Case4 showed higher shutdown energy and shutdown time as the Gate was held approximately 9V for approximately 1μsec and the peak current did not reduce and kept It the same. This is because the gate holding voltage of 9V threshold is keeping the SiC module conducting and the peak current was not reduced. If the power module “turn on threshold” is just below 9V, then it would reduce the SC current and the 2LTO would be effective in such case only.
The four cases shown above are repeated for IGBT power module as well.
The performance of the IGBT was comparable to SiC power module in terms of how DESAT/OC circuit behavior.
However, as the overall peak current observed in the IGBT module was much lower compared to SiC. Because of this, the shutdown energy and shutdown time are all much lower for IGBT module.