SLVAEQ2 April 2020 TPS2549-Q1 , TPS254900-Q1 , TPS254900A-Q1 , TPS2556-Q1 , TPS2557-Q1 , TPS2559-Q1 , TPS25830-Q1 , TPS25831-Q1 , TPS25832-Q1 , TPS25833-Q1 , TPS25840-Q1 , TPS25842-Q1
This solution is easy to understand. When the current limit point is higher than 1.6*Ia, the IC will not do any response to the OCP test. What you need to consider is whether or not the IC can support 1.6*Ia at a continuous current. TPS2583x/4x-Q1 internal FET has a peak current limit. If 10 µH inductors are used as EVM, it can support 4.5A maximum continuous output current. So, the solution can be summarized as shown in Table 4.
Ia of USB Port | Methods (set current limit .1.6*Ia) |
---|---|
1.5A | Set current limit > 2.4A |
2.1A | Set current limit >3.36A |
2.4A | Set current limit > 3.84A |
3A | Set current limit > 4.8A and add 330 µF cap on CSP |
Below are the test results of the four cases listed in Table 4.
Overall, increasing the current limit higher than 1.6*Ia is a solution with the least change to the schematic to pass the MFi OCP test. However, it has an obvious limitation that some devices cannot support 1.6*Ia continuous output current. Extra capacitance needs to be added to make up for this limitation. At the same time, some customers do not want to set the current limit so high, even if it does not affect the IC function. They prefer to set a current limiting value similar to Ia, such as 1.2*Ia. Solution 2 is for the application of setting small current limit point.