SLYT846 February 2024 TPS62870 , TPS62870-Q1 , TPS62871 , TPS62871-Q1 , TPS62872 , TPS62872-Q1 , TPS62873 , TPS62873-Q1 , TPS62874-Q1 , TPS62875-Q1 , TPS62876-Q1 , TPS62877-Q1 , TPS6287B10 , TPS6287B15 , TPS6287B20 , TPS6287B25 , TPSM8287A06 , TPSM8287A10 , TPSM8287A12 , TPSM8287A15
While most applications operate a fixed-frequency DCS-Control device in forced PWM mode in order to obtain lower output-voltage ripple at light loads and a better transient response, the topology does support a power-save mode to increase efficiency at light loads. To maintain the target switching frequency and provide lower ripple down to lower load currents, fixed-frequency DCS-Control reduces the on-time in power-save mode, whereas DCS-Control keeps the on-time constant. Both topologies enter power-save mode when the inductor current becomes discontinuous, which creates slightly higher ripple compared to PWM mode.
Instead of reducing the frequency with the same on-time, fixed-frequency DCS-Control’s power-save mode reduces the on-time while maintaining the same frequency. Reducing the on-time delivers less energy to the output, thereby reducing the ripple voltage compared to DCS-Control. Once the on-time reduces to its minimum, skipping pulses reduces the output power further for the lightest loads. Skipping pulses also reduces the frequency.
Figure 4 and Figure 5 show the difference in frequency reduction in power-save mode. The fixed-frequency DCS-Control device reduces its frequency below loads of around 60mA, while the DCS-Control device begins reducing the frequency around 500mA. Although these current values are different for different devices and operating conditions, fixed-frequency DCS-Control maintains its switching frequency down to lower load currents, leading to lower ripple.