SLVA504A February 2012 – July 2021 DRV8243-Q1 , DRV8244-Q1 , DRV8245-Q1 , DRV8800 , DRV8801 , DRV8802 , DRV8803 , DRV8804 , DRV8805 , DRV8806 , DRV8811 , DRV8812 , DRV8813 , DRV8814 , DRV8818 , DRV8821 , DRV8823 , DRV8824 , DRV8825 , DRV8828 , DRV8829 , DRV8830 , DRV8832 , DRV8832-Q1 , DRV8833 , DRV8834 , DRV8835 , DRV8836 , DRV8837 , DRV8840 , DRV8841 , DRV8842 , DRV8843 , DRV8844 , DRV8870 , DRV8871 , DRV8872
Figure 1-4 shows the switching sequence of a half bridge in PWM regulation between HS - Load (region # 1) and LS - Load (region # 5) with other transitions (region # 2, 3, and 4 for rising edge and region # 6, 7, and 8 for falling edge). The power dissipation on each FET is as follows:
Region | Time ratio within PWM cycle | LS [W] | HS [W] |
---|---|---|---|
1 | D1 | 0 | RON × IL2 |
2 | VM/SRLSOFF x fPWM | 0 | 0.5 x VM x IL |
3 | tDEAD_LSOFF x fPWM | VD x IL | 0 |
4 | VD/SRHSON x fPWM | 0.5 x VD x IL | 0 |
5 | (1 - D)1 | RON × IL2 | 0 |
6 | VD/SRHSOFF x fPWM | 0.5 x VD x IL | 0 |
7 | tDEAD_LSON x fPWM | VD x IL | 0 |
8 | VM/SRLSON x fPWM | 0 | 0.5 x VM x IL |
In Table 1-4,
If we assume power dissipation in regions #4 and #6 are negligible, slews rate match for rising and falling edges, dead times are equal, then power dissipation for each FET can be approximated as follows:
Compared to a H-bridge driver, the power dissipation due to conduction losses is approximately cut in half, however, the switching losses remain the same.