SNLA335B september   2019  – may 2023 DS250DF210 , DS250DF230 , DS250DF410 , DS250DF810 , DS280BR810 , DS280BR820 , DS280DF810 , DS280MB810

 

  1.   Optimal Implementation of 25G/28G Retimers versus Redrivers in Common Applications
  2.   Trademarks
  3. 1Overview of TI 25G/28G Retimers and Redrivers
  4. 2When to use a Retimer Versus Redriver
  5. 3Retimers for Common Network Interfaces
  6. 4Link Training Support With TI Signal Conditioning Devices
  7. 5Retimer and Redrivers Part Selection
  8. 6Revision History

When to use a Retimer Versus Redriver

Table 2-1 lists a high-level summary of chip-to-chip interface types based on their transmission channel's insertion loss at around the Nyquist frequency for 25Gbps data rate. The amount of channel loss will dictate the level of signal conditioning required for an error free chip-to-chip link. Some portion of system interconnects will have channel loss that is within the equalization compensation capability of the chips being linked together. Such links do not require signal conditioning. Links requiring a moderate amount of compensation (up to 20dB) may use a redriver instead of a retimer, in that way realizing some relative savings in power consumption and cost. Links involving transmission across a channel with very high loss require the use of a retimer.

Table 2-1 Retimer Versus Redriver Selection Based On Chip-to-Chip Channel Insertion Loss
25Gbps CHIP-TO-CHIP LINK CASE RECOMMENDED SIGNAL CONDITIONING (SigCon) LEVEL
Channel loss within the chip's compensation capability No SigCon required
Channel loss exceeding chip compensation by up to 20dB TI 25G/28G redriver
20dB < channel loss < 35dB TI 25G/28G retimer