SLUAAJ1 May 2022 TPS62860 , TPS62861 , TPS62864 , TPS62866 , TPS62868 , TPS62869 , TPS62870 , TPS62870-Q1 , TPS62871 , TPS62871-Q1 , TPS62872 , TPS62872-Q1 , TPS62873 , TPS62873-Q1 , TPS62874-Q1 , TPS62875-Q1 , TPS62876-Q1 , TPS62877-Q1 , TPSM82810 , TPSM82813 , TPSM82816 , TPSM82864A , TPSM82866A , TPSM82866C , TPSM8287A06 , TPSM8287A10 , TPSM8287A12 , TPSM8287A15
All trademarks are the property of their respective owners.
Texas Instruments data sheets provide numerous thermal values to quantify the thermal performance of a particular device. The most commonly used thermal values for power modules are RθJA, ΨJB, and ΨJT. Their basic usage for assessing power modules is described below, while Semiconductor and IC Package Thermal Metrics explains the different thermal metrics in detail.
Equation 1 uses RθJA to calculate the rise in the device’s temperature (its junction temperature) from a fixed ambient temperature with a given power loss. This equation and thermal value are used when the application’s ambient temperature is controlled.
Equation 2 uses ΨJB to calculate the rise in the device’s temperature from a fixed PCB temperature with a given power loss. This equation and thermal value are used when the application’s PCB temperature is controlled. Even though all of the device’s power loss does not go into the PCB, the ΨJB value accounts for this (as opposed to the RθJB value) and results in the simple equation.
Equation 3 uses ΨJT to calculate the rise in the device’s temperature from the temperature on the top of its case, as measured by a thermal camera for example. This equation and thermal value are used to determine the junction temperature from a measurement of the case temperature. Even though all of the device’s power loss does not go up through the top of the case, the ΨJT value accounts for this (as opposed to the RθJC (top) value) and results in the simple equation.
The thermal performance not only depends on the device itself, but also on the PCB on which it is routed. The power module’s data sheet sometimes gives two sets of thermal values: one for a standard JEDEC PCB and one for the EVM. Unlike the standard JEDEC PCB, the EVM incorporates design techniques to better allow the PCB to work together with the power module to improve the thermal performance. These techniques are discussed in Section 4.
Figure 1-1 shows these three thermal values, from both the JEDEC PCB and the EVM, for a 6-A power module TPSM82866A.
Figure 2-1 shows a Safe Operating Area (SOA) curve for the same TPSM82866A power module. SOA curves show the maximum recommended temperature versus load current, as a quick aid to check if a device is thermally suitable for a given application. This particular curve uses the ambient temperature and the EVM’s RθJA value to determine the Safe Operating Area. Using these two values, combined with the power loss at each operating point, Equation 1 creates the boundary lines in the SOA curve. The top of the curve at 6 A reflects the recommended maximum output current due to the device’s rated current, while the sloped portion of the line reflects the recommended maximum output current due to the power losses, and resulting temperature rise, at that operating point. Operate below the lines to keep the device within its rated junction temperature.
Table 2-1 shows two operating conditions for powering an SoC with an input voltage of 5 V and output voltage of 1.2 V. Figure 2-2 demonstrates that the first operating condition (red dot) is outside of the SOA curve, at the elevated ambient temperature. The second operating condition (blue dot) shows one solution to operate within the SOA curve: lower the output current.
Operating Condition 1 | Operating Condition 2 |
---|---|
Ambient temperature: 95°C | Ambient temperature: 95°C |
Output current: 6 A | Output current: 5 A |
Not recommended | Recommended |
One way to reduce the output current is to reduce the processing speed of the SoC. Another solution to operate within the SOA curve would be to reduce the maximum ambient temperature or to reduce the RθJA by adding airflow to the system.
The SOA curves are usually created from measured efficiency data on the EVM. From Equation 1, the power loss at various ambient temperatures creates the temperature rise required to reach the power module’s maximum operating temperature of 125°C.
Equation 4 calculates the power loss from the data sheet’s efficiency curves:
Because efficiency at high loads decreases with increasing temperature, the efficiency values at an elevated temperature (such as 85°C) are used. As an example, Figure 3-1 shows the efficiency curve at 85°C for the same 5 Vin and 1.2 Vout condition. At 5.5 A load with nearly 84% efficiency, Equation 4 calculates the power loss as 1.25 W. Multiplying by the 25.4 °C/W RθJA value gives a temperature rise of 32°C. Subtracting this from the 125°C maximum temperature results in a maximum ambient temperature of 93°C. Thus, the SOA curve in Figure 2-1 crosses 5.5 A near 93°C.
The RθJA value is one metric to quantify a device’s thermal performance. The RθJA value depends on the power module’s design, as well as the PCB’s design. Having external thermal pads under the package allows good thermal performance by allowing multiple GND vias to heat sink the device to the PCB’s multiple GND layers. Also, having a pin-out that allows large copper planes to connect to the device’s power pins (VIN, GND, VOUT) reduces the RθJA value. Figure 4-1 shows that the TPSM82866A provides a large thermal pad, while Figure 4-2 shows that the pin-out allows an easy plane connection to the power pins.
Once the power module is designed for good thermal performance, the PCB must be designed to work effectively with the power module to remove the power loss. Thermal vias should be placed beneath the thermal pad to transfer the heat from the power module to the layers within the PCB. Placing multiple vias closely spaced to each other reduces the RθJA value. However, once a few vias are placed on the thermal pad, the point of diminishing returns is reached and adding more vias does not usually reduce the value significantly. The number of vias shown in the data sheet’s layout example or in the package drawing is a good starting point for achieving good thermal performance. Thermal Performance Optimization of High-Power Density Buck Converters discusses the impact of vias on thermal performance in detail.
In addition to thermal vias, having ground planes on multiple PCB layers and increasing the copper area connected to the power pins of the device helps improve the thermal performance. Adding airflow greatly reduces the RθJA value. Improving the Thermal Performance of a MicroSiP™ Power Module provides more details on improving thermal performance through thermal vias and additional PCB layers.