SCDA017A September 2019 – July 2024 BQ24392 , HD3SS212 , HD3SS213 , HD3SS214 , HD3SS215 , HD3SS3202 , HD3SS3212 , HD3SS3220 , HD3SS3411 , HD3SS460 , TMUXHS4212 , TS3DV642 , TS3USB221 , TS3USB221A , TS3USB221E , TS3USB30 , TS3USB3000 , TS3USB3031 , TS3USB30E , TS3USB31 , TS3USB31E , TS3USB3200 , TS5USBA224 , TS5USBC400 , TS5USBC402 , TS5USBC41 , TUSB1042I , TUSB542
System designers often need to make trade-offs between specifications in order to achieve optimal performance for the target application. The trade-off between RON and BW is important for high-speed interface and video signals. No matter how low Ron can be maintained in the chip manufacturing process, they still form an undesired low-pass filter that attenuates the mux output signal. Meanwhile, low RON muxes have larger parasitic capacitance that reduce bandwidth and cause signal distortion. Also, low-RON muxes require large chip sizes, which increases the mux cost.
There are several key features to consider when selecting the mux to use in a particular application. High-speed applications have unique requirements (with respect to the minimum acceptable 3 dB bandwidth). Understanding the bandwidth capability of a signal mux is key for high-speed interface and video systems
So what should be the min BW for a given datarate. A good rule of thumb is BW should be greater than or equal to 1.5 or 2 times Niquist. For example, USB2 (240 MHz) times 1.5 is 360 MHz – 480 MHz. Obvious, high bandwidth will provide sharper edges, but you don't want too much BW. Too much BW can have the undesired affect of passing unwanted signal (noise).